Tom Wakeford
Biographic Data
| ID | 213463 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Tom Wakeford |
| GIVEN NAMES | Tom |
| FAMILY NAME | Wakeford |
| SIGNATURE | WAKEFORD T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Creative Commons |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4721-3658 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1996 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Re-fashioning citizens' juries
A citizens’ jury (CJ) is, in essence, a forum designed to foster public deliberation and to influence decision-making on contentious issues. Over the past twenty years, the number of initiatives called CJs has increased. At the same time many CJs, by failing to foster effective dialogue and the co-production of knowledge, have tended towards being mere show-trials rather than robust processes of deliberative democracy. Here, we outline a fresh ap…
Exploring the entry points for citizen science in urban sustainability initiatives
Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge
We examine the roles of the diverse co-inquirers involved in the power-equalizing action research project known as Prajateerpu. While privileging neither official expertise nor experiential knowledge over the other, we suggest the need to create arenas where expert knowledge is put under public scrutiny as a means of contributing to a redressing of the power imbalance that exists between the poor and elite social groups. We emphasize the importan…
Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge
Prajateerpu(translation: ‘people’s verdict’) has been devised as an exercise for allowing those people most affected by the ‘Vision 2020’ for food and farming in Andhra Pradesh (AP, India) to shape a vision of their own. We explore Prajateerpuas a case study in participatory action research that took place against a background of social, political and scientific controversy in which we were active participants. Having examined different methods i…
Valuing the environment and valuing lives
Blueprint 4: Capturing Global Environmental Value by David Pearce. London: Earthscan, 1995. Pp.xiii + 212; index. £10.95 (paperback). ISBN 1 85383 184 0 Valuing Climate Change by Sam Frankhauser. London: Earthscan, 1995. Pp.xiv + 180; index. £14.95. ISBN 1 85383 237 5
Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge
Prajateerpu(translation: ‘people’s verdict’) has been devised as an exercise for allowing those people most affected by the ‘Vision 2020’ for food and farming in Andhra Pradesh (AP, India) to shape a vision of their own. We explore Prajateerpuas a case study in participatory action research that took place against a background of social, political and scientific controversy in which we were active participants. Having examined different methods i…
Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge
We examine the roles of the diverse co-inquirers involved in the power-equalizing action research project known as Prajateerpu. While privileging neither official expertise nor experiential knowledge over the other, we suggest the need to create arenas where expert knowledge is put under public scrutiny as a means of contributing to a redressing of the power imbalance that exists between the poor and elite social groups. We emphasize the importan…
Valuing the environment and valuing lives
Blueprint 4: Capturing Global Environmental Value by David Pearce. London: Earthscan, 1995. Pp.xiii + 212; index. £10.95 (paperback). ISBN 1 85383 184 0 Valuing Climate Change by Sam Frankhauser. London: Earthscan, 1995. Pp.xiv + 180; index. £14.95. ISBN 1 85383 237 5
Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge
Prajateerpu(translation: ‘people’s verdict’) has been devised as an exercise for allowing those people most affected by the ‘Vision 2020’ for food and farming in Andhra Pradesh (AP, India) to shape a vision of their own. We explore Prajateerpuas a case study in participatory action research that took place against a background of social, political and scientific controversy in which we were active participants. Having examined different methods i…
Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge
We examine the roles of the diverse co-inquirers involved in the power-equalizing action research project known as Prajateerpu. While privileging neither official expertise nor experiential knowledge over the other, we suggest the need to create arenas where expert knowledge is put under public scrutiny as a means of contributing to a redressing of the power imbalance that exists between the poor and elite social groups. We emphasize the importan…
Re-fashioning citizens' juries
A citizens’ jury (CJ) is, in essence, a forum designed to foster public deliberation and to influence decision-making on contentious issues. Over the past twenty years, the number of initiatives called CJs has increased. At the same time many CJs, by failing to foster effective dialogue and the co-production of knowledge, have tended towards being mere show-trials rather than robust processes of deliberative democracy. Here, we outline a fresh ap…
Exploring the entry points for citizen science in urban sustainability initiatives
Political science (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Action (physics (3 works) · Citizen journalism (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Public relations (3 works) · Ecology (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Participatory action research (2 works)