Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deborah O''Connor

Biographic Data

ID277223
NAMEDeborah O''Connor
GIVEN NAMESDeborah
FAMILY NAMEO''Connor
SIGNATURECONNOR D O
AFFILIATIONSMonash University
ORCID0000-0002-6836-122X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS16
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX2
  • How Do Australians Manage Diagnostic Testing Risks? Focus Groups Linked to a Model of Behaviour Change

    Open Access•Tomas Rozbroj, Catriona Parker et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2024

    BACKGROUND: Diagnostic tests carry significant risks, and communications are needed to help lay people consider these. The development of communications has been hindered by poor knowledge about how lay people understand and negotiate testing risks. We examined lay Australians' perceptions of diagnostic testing risks and how these risks are managed. METHOD: We completed 12 semistructured online focus groups with 61 Australian adults (18+) between…

  • How do people understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

    Open Access•Tomas Rozbroj, Romi Haas et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews

    Bronwen Merner, Dianne Lowe et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2021

    Case study 1 describes stakeholder involvement in setting systematic review priorities

  • A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems

    Open Access•Lou Atkins, J Francis et al.•ARTICLE•Implementation Science•2017

    BACKGROUND: Implementing new practices requires changes in the behaviour of relevant actors, and this is facilitated by understanding of the determinants of current and desired behaviours. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed by a collaboration of behavioural scientists and implementation researchers who identified theories relevant to implementation and grouped constructs from these theories into domains. The collaboration aimed…

  • The SPIRIT Action Framework

    Open Access•Sally Redman, Tari Turner et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2015•Cited by: 14•References: 57

    The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: h…

  • Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

    Open Access•James E Cane, James Cane et al.•ARTICLE•Implementation Science•2012

  • Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice

    Open Access•Simon French, Simon D French et al.•ARTICLE•Implementation Science•2012

    BACKGROUND: There is little systematic operational guidance about how best to develop complex interventions to reduce the gap between practice and evidence. This article is one in a Series of articles documenting the development and use of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to advance the science of implementation research. METHODS: The intervention was developed considering three main components: theory, evidence, and practical issues. We u…

  • Email as a Data Collection Tool when Interviewing Older Adults

    Open Access•Mario A Brondani, Michael I Macentee et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 16

    This article explores several aspects of electronic communication, specifically its advantages and disadvantages within the context of a brief experience using email to interview elders. Two older adults participated via email as the psychosocial impact of aging was collected using such venue. Our experiences are compared with published reports from others to analyze the benefits and limitations of email as a research tool. The email was spontane…

  • The SPIRIT Action Framework

    Open Access•Sally Redman, Tari Turner et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2015•Cited by: 14•References: 57

    The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: h…

  • Email as a Data Collection Tool when Interviewing Older Adults

    Open Access•Mario A Brondani, Michael I Macentee et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 16

    This article explores several aspects of electronic communication, specifically its advantages and disadvantages within the context of a brief experience using email to interview elders. Two older adults participated via email as the psychosocial impact of aging was collected using such venue. Our experiences are compared with published reports from others to analyze the benefits and limitations of email as a research tool. The email was spontane…

  • Email as a Data Collection Tool when Interviewing Older Adults

    Open Access•Mario A Brondani, Michael I Macentee et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 16

    This article explores several aspects of electronic communication, specifically its advantages and disadvantages within the context of a brief experience using email to interview elders. Two older adults participated via email as the psychosocial impact of aging was collected using such venue. Our experiences are compared with published reports from others to analyze the benefits and limitations of email as a research tool. The email was spontane…

  • Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

    Open Access•James E Cane, James Cane et al.•ARTICLE•Implementation Science•2012

  • Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice

    Open Access•Simon French, Simon D French et al.•ARTICLE•Implementation Science•2012

    BACKGROUND: There is little systematic operational guidance about how best to develop complex interventions to reduce the gap between practice and evidence. This article is one in a Series of articles documenting the development and use of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to advance the science of implementation research. METHODS: The intervention was developed considering three main components: theory, evidence, and practical issues. We u…

  • The SPIRIT Action Framework

    Open Access•Sally Redman, Tari Turner et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2015•Cited by: 14•References: 57

    The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: h…

  • A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems

    Open Access•Lou Atkins, J Francis et al.•ARTICLE•Implementation Science•2017

    BACKGROUND: Implementing new practices requires changes in the behaviour of relevant actors, and this is facilitated by understanding of the determinants of current and desired behaviours. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed by a collaboration of behavioural scientists and implementation researchers who identified theories relevant to implementation and grouped constructs from these theories into domains. The collaboration aimed…

  • How do people understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

    Open Access•Tomas Rozbroj, Romi Haas et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews

    Bronwen Merner, Dianne Lowe et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2021

    Case study 1 describes stakeholder involvement in setting systematic review priorities

  • How Do Australians Manage Diagnostic Testing Risks? Focus Groups Linked to a Model of Behaviour Change

    Open Access•Tomas Rozbroj, Catriona Parker et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2024

    BACKGROUND: Diagnostic tests carry significant risks, and communications are needed to help lay people consider these. The development of communications has been hindered by poor knowledge about how lay people understand and negotiate testing risks. We examined lay Australians' perceptions of diagnostic testing risks and how these risks are managed. METHOD: We completed 12 semistructured online focus groups with 61 Australian adults (18+) between…

Health Policy Implementation Science (5 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Nursing (5 works) · Public health (5 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Health administration (3 works) · Health Informatics (3 works) · Health services research (3 works) · Management science (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae