Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Lawrence S Kleiman

Biographic Data

ID5378136
NAMELawrence S Kleiman
GIVEN NAMESLawrence S
FAMILY NAMEKleiman
SIGNATUREKLEIMAN L S
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Tennessee at Chattanooga
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS3
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1978
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1994
H-INDEX1
  • Opinions of Human Resource Professionals on Candor of Reference-Givers

    Open Access•Lawrence S Kleiman, Charles S White•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1994

    This study surveyed the views of 131 human resource professionals regarding the candidness of information given during the reference-checking process. Analysis indicated that most reference-givers are less than fully candid when describing the qualifications of a job applicant. Implications for those seeking references are discussed

  • Performance Evaluation

    Open Access•Lawrence S Kleiman, John W Lounsbury et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1987

    Data from a sample of government research scientists were used to compare the psychometric properties of pooled and consensus ratings of job performance. It was hypothesized that consensus ratings would possess less halo and leniency error and greater validity than would pooled ratings. The findings supported the halo hypothesis and partially supported the validity hypothesis. Given the severity of the “criterion problem” in validation research, …

  • Process-Oriented Variables and Measurement of Job Performance

    Open Access•Lawrence S Kleiman, Robert H Faley•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1986

    This study explored the impart of process-oriented variables on the measurement of job performance by examining raters' weighting strategy. Weighting strategy was defined as the manner in which raters weight or combine their evaluations of a subordinate's job performance to reach an over-all judgment on a dimension. Specifically, three issues were examined: (1) the amount of relative weight raters place on favorable, neutral, and unfavorable info…

  • Industrial–organizational psychology

    Michael E Gordon, Lawrence S Kleiman et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1978•Cited by: 2

  • Industrial-organizational psychology

    Michael E Gordon, Lawrence S Kleiman et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1978•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Industrial–organizational psychology

    Michael E Gordon, Lawrence S Kleiman et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1978•Cited by: 2

  • Industrial-organizational psychology

    Michael E Gordon, Lawrence S Kleiman et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1978•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Industrial–organizational psychology

    Michael E Gordon, Lawrence S Kleiman et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1978•Cited by: 2

  • Industrial-organizational psychology

    Michael E Gordon, Lawrence S Kleiman et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1978•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Process-Oriented Variables and Measurement of Job Performance

    Open Access•Lawrence S Kleiman, Robert H Faley•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1986

    This study explored the impart of process-oriented variables on the measurement of job performance by examining raters' weighting strategy. Weighting strategy was defined as the manner in which raters weight or combine their evaluations of a subordinate's job performance to reach an over-all judgment on a dimension. Specifically, three issues were examined: (1) the amount of relative weight raters place on favorable, neutral, and unfavorable info…

  • Performance Evaluation

    Open Access•Lawrence S Kleiman, John W Lounsbury et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1987

    Data from a sample of government research scientists were used to compare the psychometric properties of pooled and consensus ratings of job performance. It was hypothesized that consensus ratings would possess less halo and leniency error and greater validity than would pooled ratings. The findings supported the halo hypothesis and partially supported the validity hypothesis. Given the severity of the “criterion problem” in validation research, …

  • Opinions of Human Resource Professionals on Candor of Reference-Givers

    Open Access•Lawrence S Kleiman, Charles S White•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1994

    This study surveyed the views of 131 human resource professionals regarding the candidness of information given during the reference-checking process. Analysis indicated that most reference-givers are less than fully candid when describing the qualifications of a job applicant. Implications for those seeking references are discussed

Psychology (5 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Applied Psychology (4 works) · Applied Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Industrial and organizational psychology (2 works) · Process (computing (2 works) · Psychology of Social Influence (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae