Stephan F Gohmann
Biographic Data
| ID | 712452 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Stephan F Gohmann |
| GIVEN NAMES | Stephan F |
| FAMILY NAME | Gohmann |
| SIGNATURE | GOHMANN S F |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Louisville |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6496-5296 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 13 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Victor Nee, Sonja Opper
A Comparison of Health Care in Canada and the United States
RATIONALE: Compliance with preventive care recommendations differs between countries. Directly comparable data are often not available. The recent release of the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health makes available data for both Canadians and Americans. OBJECTIVES: The health care systems in the United States and Canada differ quite dramatically. Canadians are covered by a universal health care system while residents of the United States, …
State abortion policy and infant health
Prior research suggests that the availability of abortion services may affect the proportion of observed births with poor outcomes (e.g., low birth weight). Recent Supreme Court decisions and changes in the composition of elected officials of state governments have increased the saliency of state discretion over abortion related policies. This paper presents results from a simulation model of the effects of hypothetical state laws prohibiting abo…
Which States Will Restrict Abortions? Predictions from Votes in the House of Representatives
In response to the Supreme Court's rulings in Webster v. Reproductive Services and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, which increased the ability of states to restrict abortions, many state legislatures have reexamined their abortion policies. Several recent studies use a variety of methods to predict whether states will restrict abortion access. These studies have utilized congressional votes on abortion legislation, past …
The dependent tax exemption, abortion availability, and US fertility rates
Voting in the U.S. House on Abortion Funding Issues
A bstract . The Supreme Court's ruling in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services increased the political saliency of the abortion issue. Since pro‐choice and pro‐life groups within the constituencies of U.S. legislators paid closer attention to abortion‐related roll call votes after Webster, the legislators’ voting behavior on such issues might have changed as a result of the decision. Accordingly, voting model estimates for abortion funding iss…
Predicting State Abortion Legislation From U.S. Senate Votes
The recent Supreme Court decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services giving more discretion to states to regulate abortion has led to speculation concerning which states might move to limit abortions. Medoff (1989) attempts to predict how state legislatures might vote on state‐level abortion legislation by examining the 1983 Senate vote on the Hatch/Eagleton Amendment. We expand upon Medoff's analysis by incor‐ porating recent development…
Voting in the U.S. House on Abortion Funding Issues
A bstract . The Supreme Court's ruling in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services increased the political saliency of the abortion issue. Since pro‐choice and pro‐life groups within the constituencies of U.S. legislators paid closer attention to abortion‐related roll call votes after Webster, the legislators’ voting behavior on such issues might have changed as a result of the decision. Accordingly, voting model estimates for abortion funding iss…
Predicting State Abortion Legislation From U.S. Senate Votes
The recent Supreme Court decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services giving more discretion to states to regulate abortion has led to speculation concerning which states might move to limit abortions. Medoff (1989) attempts to predict how state legislatures might vote on state‐level abortion legislation by examining the 1983 Senate vote on the Hatch/Eagleton Amendment. We expand upon Medoff's analysis by incor‐ porating recent development…
Predicting State Abortion Legislation From U.S. Senate Votes
The recent Supreme Court decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services giving more discretion to states to regulate abortion has led to speculation concerning which states might move to limit abortions. Medoff (1989) attempts to predict how state legislatures might vote on state‐level abortion legislation by examining the 1983 Senate vote on the Hatch/Eagleton Amendment. We expand upon Medoff's analysis by incor‐ porating recent development…
Which States Will Restrict Abortions? Predictions from Votes in the House of Representatives
In response to the Supreme Court's rulings in Webster v. Reproductive Services and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, which increased the ability of states to restrict abortions, many state legislatures have reexamined their abortion policies. Several recent studies use a variety of methods to predict whether states will restrict abortion access. These studies have utilized congressional votes on abortion legislation, past …
The dependent tax exemption, abortion availability, and US fertility rates
Voting in the U.S. House on Abortion Funding Issues
A bstract . The Supreme Court's ruling in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services increased the political saliency of the abortion issue. Since pro‐choice and pro‐life groups within the constituencies of U.S. legislators paid closer attention to abortion‐related roll call votes after Webster, the legislators’ voting behavior on such issues might have changed as a result of the decision. Accordingly, voting model estimates for abortion funding iss…
State abortion policy and infant health
Prior research suggests that the availability of abortion services may affect the proportion of observed births with poor outcomes (e.g., low birth weight). Recent Supreme Court decisions and changes in the composition of elected officials of state governments have increased the saliency of state discretion over abortion related policies. This paper presents results from a simulation model of the effects of hypothetical state laws prohibiting abo…
A Comparison of Health Care in Canada and the United States
RATIONALE: Compliance with preventive care recommendations differs between countries. Directly comparable data are often not available. The recent release of the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health makes available data for both Canadians and Americans. OBJECTIVES: The health care systems in the United States and Canada differ quite dramatically. Canadians are covered by a universal health care system while residents of the United States, …
Victor Nee, Sonja Opper
Political science (6 works) · Abortion (5 works) · Economics (5 works) · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Demography (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Population (4 works) · Pregnancy (4 works) · Sociology (4 works)