Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jennifer M Lehmann

Biographic Data

ID80445
NAMEJennifer M Lehmann
GIVEN NAMESJennifer M
FAMILY NAMELehmann
SIGNATURELEHMANN J M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS24
TOTAL CITATIONS41
AUTHOR COUNT20
EDITOR COUNT4
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1990
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2013
H-INDEX4
  • Deconstructing Durkheim

    Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Deconstructing Durkheim•2013

    The author analyzes Durkheim's social theory from the standpoint of critical structuralism. She explores Durkheim's discussion of the relationship between the individual and society. She also addresses the question of Durkheim's understanding of the relationship between the subject and object of knowledge, and the relationship between truth and ideology

  • Deaths of Authors and Lives of Texts

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2008

    construct, for concrete reality that is both transsocietal and divided by unequal races, classes, sexes, and nations. Further more, on close reading, Durkheim believes in sacred nature of the personality-not the individual-the social, hence sacred, socially determined ideal half of spirit/body dichotomy through which he orizes individuals. In fact, individuating aspect of individuals-the body-is that which Durkheim opposes to collective, social a…

  • Social theory as politics in knowledge

    Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Social theory as politics in…•2006

  • Social Theory as Politics in Knowledge

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Social theory as politics in…•2005

    Discusses, and manifests, interrelated perspectives in social theory. This volume includes: scientific knowledge, which is theoretical, political, and social.

  • Bringing Capitalism Back for Critique by Social Theory

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Bringing capitalism back for…•2002

    Rosa Luxemburg's Accumulation of capital : critics try to bury the message / Paul Zarembka -- Class and causation in Bourdieu / Elliot B. Weininger -- Gender, class and welfare state formation in the 21st century / Susan Thistle -- Abolitionism and social theory : slavery, "wage-slavery," and the visibility of oppression / David Norman Smith -- Ideology after the millennium : problems of legitimation in American society / Richard Harvey Brown -- …

  • Critical Theory

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann, J Lehmann•BOOK•Critical theory•2002

    Part I: Bringing Marxism back ... with Foucault -- Foucoult's encounter with Marxism / Paul Paolucci -- Part II: Critical theories of knowledge: epistemology and culture -- Afrocentricity and the Eurocentric hegemony of knowledge: contradictions of place / Molefi Kete Asante -- Epistemology, culture and rhetoric: some social implications of human cognition / Thomas J. Burns and Terri LeMoyne -- Films and utopia: the culture industry revisited / J…

  • Bringing capitalism back for critique by social theory

    Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Bringing capitalism back for…•2002

  • Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 19

    Barry Smart, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2001

  • A Dialectical Response to Levine's “French Tradition”

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Sociological Quarterly•2001

    In this paper I examine and critique Donald Levine's treatment of the “French Tradition” in sociological thought. After summarizing Levine's account of the development of the French tradition, I discuss the identification of the French tradition with the work of Durkheim, and discuss the reasons for the predominance of Durkheim's work over and above other plausible candidates for exemplars of the French tradition of sociology. I then use this dis…

  • "A Dialectical Response to Levine's "French Tradition

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Sociological Quarterly•2000

    In this paper I examine and critique Donald Levine's treatment of the “French Tradition” in sociological thought. After summarizing Levine's account of the development of the French tradition, I discuss the identification of the French tradition with the work of Durkheim, and discuss the reasons for the predominance of Durkheim's work over and above other plausible candidates for exemplars of the French tradition of sociology. I then use this dis…

  • Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Volume 18

    Henry S Rubin, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1999

  • Feminist Contentions

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Seyla Benhabib et al.•REVIEW•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1997•Cited by: 1

  • Durkheim, Morals, and Modernity

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann, W Watts Miller•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1997•Cited by: 11

  • Emile Durkheim

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann, Stephen Turner et al.•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1996

    Paulo Ceri, Torino University Hans-Peter Muller, Heidelberg University W. S. F. Pickering, Cambridge Howard Andrews, Toronto W. Paul Vogt, New York Philippe Besnard, GEMAS, Paris Jean-Claude Filloux, Paris Robert Alun Jones, University of Illinois Hans Joas, Free University of Berlin Francois-Andre Isambert, France

  • Durkheim and Women

    Douglas F Challenger, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Social Forces•1996

  • Deconstructing Durkheim

    Kenneth W Thompson, Kenneth Thompson et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1995

  • Ethics and the Sociology of Morals

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Emile Durkheim et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1995

  • Durkheim and Women

    Marco Orru, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1995

  • The Question of Caste in Modern Society

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•American Sociological Review•1995•Cited by: 7•References: 23

    I explore a set contradictions crucial to Durkheim's work, that revolve around the issue whether modern society (i.e., industrial capitalism) is structured according to the principle individual mobility or the principle caste. Specifically, I analyze Durkheim's theories race, class, and sex to determine if they describe modern society in terms individuals or in terms castes. I find that Durkheim has both a dominant and a subordinate theory for ea…

  • Durkheim's Theories of Deviance and Suicide

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•American Journal of Sociology•1995•Cited by: 17•References: 12

    In The division of labor in society, Durkheim conceptualizes deviance as an essentially asocial phenomenon, and he conceptualizes "woman" as an essentially asocial being. Both theories contradict Durkkheim's characteristic social determinism, and both encounter, in Suicide, two further contradictions. First, Suicide demonstrates conclusively that relatively asocial individuals, women, are actually much less prone to deviance than relatively socia…

  • Emile Durkheim

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Stephen P Turner et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1994

  • Deconstructing Durkheim

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Deconstructing Durkheim•1993

    Introduction Part I: Durkheim's Social Ontology 1. The 'Structure' of Individuals 2. The Social Determination of 'Individuals' 3. The Individualism of Durkheim Part II: 4. Ideology and Truth: Individual and Collective Knowledge 5. Collective Ideology 6. Collective Truth

  • Durkheim's Response to Feminism

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Sociological Theory•1990•Cited by: 5•References: 14

    There is a striking parallel between Durkheim's assessment of feminism and his assessment of socialism.1 For Durkheim feminism, like socialism, is essentially an unconscious movement. Like socialism, feminism is a nonscientific, misguided perception of conditions which are nonetheless both real and problematic. Like socialism, feminism misinterprets actual social problems and therefore suggests radical (i.e., unrealistic and destructive) pseudoso…

  • The Sexual Contract

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Carole Pateman•ARTICLE•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1990

  • Durkheim's Theories of Deviance and Suicide

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•American Journal of Sociology•1995•Cited by: 17•References: 12

    In The division of labor in society, Durkheim conceptualizes deviance as an essentially asocial phenomenon, and he conceptualizes "woman" as an essentially asocial being. Both theories contradict Durkkheim's characteristic social determinism, and both encounter, in Suicide, two further contradictions. First, Suicide demonstrates conclusively that relatively asocial individuals, women, are actually much less prone to deviance than relatively socia…

  • Durkheim, Morals, and Modernity

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann, W Watts Miller•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1997•Cited by: 11

  • The Question of Caste in Modern Society

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•American Sociological Review•1995•Cited by: 7•References: 23

    I explore a set contradictions crucial to Durkheim's work, that revolve around the issue whether modern society (i.e., industrial capitalism) is structured according to the principle individual mobility or the principle caste. Specifically, I analyze Durkheim's theories race, class, and sex to determine if they describe modern society in terms individuals or in terms castes. I find that Durkheim has both a dominant and a subordinate theory for ea…

  • Durkheim's Response to Feminism

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Sociological Theory•1990•Cited by: 5•References: 14

    There is a striking parallel between Durkheim's assessment of feminism and his assessment of socialism.1 For Durkheim feminism, like socialism, is essentially an unconscious movement. Like socialism, feminism is a nonscientific, misguided perception of conditions which are nonetheless both real and problematic. Like socialism, feminism misinterprets actual social problems and therefore suggests radical (i.e., unrealistic and destructive) pseudoso…

  • Feminist Contentions

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Seyla Benhabib et al.•REVIEW•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1997•Cited by: 1

  • Durkheim's Response to Feminism

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Sociological Theory•1990•Cited by: 5•References: 14

    There is a striking parallel between Durkheim's assessment of feminism and his assessment of socialism.1 For Durkheim feminism, like socialism, is essentially an unconscious movement. Like socialism, feminism is a nonscientific, misguided perception of conditions which are nonetheless both real and problematic. Like socialism, feminism misinterprets actual social problems and therefore suggests radical (i.e., unrealistic and destructive) pseudoso…

  • The Sexual Contract

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Carole Pateman•ARTICLE•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1990

  • Deconstructing Durkheim

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Deconstructing Durkheim•1993

    Introduction Part I: Durkheim's Social Ontology 1. The 'Structure' of Individuals 2. The Social Determination of 'Individuals' 3. The Individualism of Durkheim Part II: 4. Ideology and Truth: Individual and Collective Knowledge 5. Collective Ideology 6. Collective Truth

  • Emile Durkheim

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Stephen P Turner et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1994

  • Deconstructing Durkheim

    Kenneth W Thompson, Kenneth Thompson et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1995

  • Ethics and the Sociology of Morals

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Emile Durkheim et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1995

  • Durkheim and Women

    Marco Orru, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1995

  • The Question of Caste in Modern Society

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•American Sociological Review•1995•Cited by: 7•References: 23

    I explore a set contradictions crucial to Durkheim's work, that revolve around the issue whether modern society (i.e., industrial capitalism) is structured according to the principle individual mobility or the principle caste. Specifically, I analyze Durkheim's theories race, class, and sex to determine if they describe modern society in terms individuals or in terms castes. I find that Durkheim has both a dominant and a subordinate theory for ea…

  • Durkheim's Theories of Deviance and Suicide

    Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•American Journal of Sociology•1995•Cited by: 17•References: 12

    In The division of labor in society, Durkheim conceptualizes deviance as an essentially asocial phenomenon, and he conceptualizes "woman" as an essentially asocial being. Both theories contradict Durkkheim's characteristic social determinism, and both encounter, in Suicide, two further contradictions. First, Suicide demonstrates conclusively that relatively asocial individuals, women, are actually much less prone to deviance than relatively socia…

  • Emile Durkheim

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann, Stephen Turner et al.•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1996

    Paulo Ceri, Torino University Hans-Peter Muller, Heidelberg University W. S. F. Pickering, Cambridge Howard Andrews, Toronto W. Paul Vogt, New York Philippe Besnard, GEMAS, Paris Jean-Claude Filloux, Paris Robert Alun Jones, University of Illinois Hans Joas, Free University of Berlin Francois-Andre Isambert, France

  • Durkheim and Women

    Douglas F Challenger, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Social Forces•1996

  • Feminist Contentions

    Jennifer M Lehmann, Seyla Benhabib et al.•REVIEW•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1997•Cited by: 1

  • Durkheim, Morals, and Modernity

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann, W Watts Miller•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1997•Cited by: 11

  • Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Volume 18

    Henry S Rubin, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1999

  • "A Dialectical Response to Levine's "French Tradition

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Sociological Quarterly•2000

    In this paper I examine and critique Donald Levine's treatment of the “French Tradition” in sociological thought. After summarizing Levine's account of the development of the French tradition, I discuss the identification of the French tradition with the work of Durkheim, and discuss the reasons for the predominance of Durkheim's work over and above other plausible candidates for exemplars of the French tradition of sociology. I then use this dis…

  • Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 19

    Barry Smart, Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2001

  • A Dialectical Response to Levine's “French Tradition”

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Sociological Quarterly•2001

    In this paper I examine and critique Donald Levine's treatment of the “French Tradition” in sociological thought. After summarizing Levine's account of the development of the French tradition, I discuss the identification of the French tradition with the work of Durkheim, and discuss the reasons for the predominance of Durkheim's work over and above other plausible candidates for exemplars of the French tradition of sociology. I then use this dis…

  • Bringing Capitalism Back for Critique by Social Theory

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Bringing capitalism back for…•2002

    Rosa Luxemburg's Accumulation of capital : critics try to bury the message / Paul Zarembka -- Class and causation in Bourdieu / Elliot B. Weininger -- Gender, class and welfare state formation in the 21st century / Susan Thistle -- Abolitionism and social theory : slavery, "wage-slavery," and the visibility of oppression / David Norman Smith -- Ideology after the millennium : problems of legitimation in American society / Richard Harvey Brown -- …

  • Critical Theory

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann, J Lehmann•BOOK•Critical theory•2002

    Part I: Bringing Marxism back ... with Foucault -- Foucoult's encounter with Marxism / Paul Paolucci -- Part II: Critical theories of knowledge: epistemology and culture -- Afrocentricity and the Eurocentric hegemony of knowledge: contradictions of place / Molefi Kete Asante -- Epistemology, culture and rhetoric: some social implications of human cognition / Thomas J. Burns and Terri LeMoyne -- Films and utopia: the culture industry revisited / J…

  • Bringing capitalism back for critique by social theory

    Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Bringing capitalism back for…•2002

  • Social Theory as Politics in Knowledge

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Social theory as politics in…•2005

    Discusses, and manifests, interrelated perspectives in social theory. This volume includes: scientific knowledge, which is theoretical, political, and social.

  • Social theory as politics in knowledge

    Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Social theory as politics in…•2006

  • Deaths of Authors and Lives of Texts

    Open Access•Jennifer M Lehmann•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2008

    construct, for concrete reality that is both transsocietal and divided by unequal races, classes, sexes, and nations. Further more, on close reading, Durkheim believes in sacred nature of the personality-not the individual-the social, hence sacred, socially determined ideal half of spirit/body dichotomy through which he orizes individuals. In fact, individuating aspect of individuals-the body-is that which Durkheim opposes to collective, social a…

  • Deconstructing Durkheim

    Jennifer M Lehmann•BOOK•Deconstructing Durkheim•2013

    The author analyzes Durkheim's social theory from the standpoint of critical structuralism. She explores Durkheim's discussion of the relationship between the individual and society. She also addresses the question of Durkheim's understanding of the relationship between the subject and object of knowledge, and the relationship between truth and ideology

Sociology (22 works) · Epistemology (15 works) · Philosophy (15 works) · Psychology (15 works) · Emile Durkheim and Sociology (12 works) · Philosophy (11 works) · Political science (10 works) · Social science (10 works) · Psychoanalysis (9 works) · Law (8 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae