Participation of Implementing Agencies in European Administrative Networks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10071024 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Polman (0000-0002-4570-2968, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 818-835 |
| Publication date | 2019-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9886 • E-ISSN: 1468-5965 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jcms.12990 |
| OpenAlex | W2985158783 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 50 |
European administrative networks are an important part of the functioning of the EU, mainly because of their role in bridging the gap between policy implementation knowledge and the policy‐making activities of the European Commission. However, the extent to which implementing agencies actually participate in these networks, and which conditions explain network participation, have not yet been investigated. This article fills this gap by studying the conditions under which implementing agencies are expected to make more use of European administrative networks. Therefore, we turn to the participation of domestic implementing agencies in an administrative network during the common agricultural policy's post‐2013 reform. Relying on a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, this case indicates that longer EU membership, in combination with a large staff and domestic implementation issues, contributes to more active participation of implementing agencies in administrative networks
Bridging (networking · Business · Commission · Computer security · European commission · European union · International trade · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative comparative analysis · Computer Science · European Union Policy and Governance · Finance · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
Europeanization of Policies and Administration
Agencification in Europe
Lobbying The European Union
Political Analysis
Decision-Making in the European Union
Politics of Attention and the Promise of Mindfulness
The strange non-death of employer and business associations
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets
Configurational Comparative Methods
Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences
Policy-making in the European Union
What Do Subnational Offices Think They Are Doing in Brussels
Friend or Foe? Inter‐agency Cooperation, Organizational Reputation, and Turf
Is Output Performance All About the Resources? A Fuzzy‐set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Street‐level Bureaucrats in Switzerland
Political parties and social media campaigning
Mapping the European administrative space
The Political Foundations of the Eurocracy
Reshaping european regulatory space
Subnational mobilisation in the European union
Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European union 1
Europe with the Regions
Filling the gap in the European administrative space
Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration
Institutional compliance, European networks of regulation and the bureaucratic autonomy of national regulatory authorities
The Rise of European Administrative Space
Transgovernmental networks in the European Union
The Quest for Co‐ordination in European Regulatory Networks
Member State Responses to Europeanization
Exchanging access goods for access
When Effect Becomes Cause
Opportunity Structures in the EU Multi-Level System
Conceptualizing and theorizingEUregulatory networks
Networks in EU Multi-level Governance
Networks of Power in the CAP System of the EU-15 and EU-27
Institutional Design and Formal Autonomy
Sequencing in public policy
Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying
With or without you’? Revisiting territorial state-bypassing in EU interest representation
No place like home? Explaining venue selection of regional offices in Brussels
European Integration from the 1980s
Systematising Policy Learning
Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |