A Priori Justification
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10694340 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer Nagel (0000-0002-0960-0497, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 251-255 |
| Publication date | 2006-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00318108-115-2-251 |
| OpenAlex | W2001322041 |
| Language | EN |
REVIEWS sciences but are multidisciplinary, and at least some of them are nevertheless legitimate questions.I have given only a selective indication of the book's contents and mer its; there is much more here of note than I have mentioned.Kornblith's discus sion is consistently clear, stimulating, witty, and well worthy of close study-the book is a pleasure to read.Kornblith successfully outlines a consistent natu ralistic position on knowledge, intuition, logic, and so forth.But the defenses of these positions are on the whole brief and do not settle the deep issues Is reliabilism correct?Is knowledge a natural kind?Can naturalism avoid self-defeat or damning circularity?and so on-that animate the naturalism/ traditionalism controversy.Nevertheless, the book advances the debate in interesting ways
A priori and a posteriori · Analytic philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · General interest · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |