Race‐Based Redistricting, Core Constituencies, and Legislative Responsiveness to Constituency Change
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10764458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christine LeVeaux (corresponding author), James Garand (0000-0001-5754-8673, corresponding author), James C Garand |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 32-51 |
| Publication date | 2003-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-4941 • E-ISSN: 1540-6237 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401003 |
| OpenAlex | W2116811392 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 24 |
Objective. Fenno (1978), Wright (1989), and other scholars suggest that legislators will be particularly responsive to various subgroups in their constituency, i.e., what might be termed the “core constituency.” We explore the degree to which Republican and Democrat House incumbents respond differently to changes in the racial composition of their districts brought about by redistricting. We speculate that (1) Democrat House incumbents will be more responsive in their roll-call behavior to changes in African-American racial composition, since African-American voters are typically a major component of the Democrat core constituency, while (2) Republicans will be less responsive, since African-American voters are typically not part of the Republican coalition. Methods. We utilize data on the roll-call behavior, member characteristics, and constituency characteristics of House members who served during both the 102nd (1991–1992) and 103rd (1993–1994) Congresses. We model roll-call liberalism in 1993 as a function of levels of and changes in district racial composition, along with control variables. To capture the different effects of racial core constituencies, we estimate our models separately for Democratic and Republican House members. Results. Our findings provide strong support for our hypothesis: Democrat incumbents respond strongly both to levels of and changes in the African-American population in their districts, while Republican incumbents respond only modestly to changes in African-American population brought on by redistricting and negatively to African-American population levels. Conclusions. Democrats and Republicans appear to respond differently to constituent groups, depending on whether the groups are part of their core constituency. Our findings suggest the importance of considering core constituencies in studying roll-call behavior and legislative responsiveness
Democracy · Demographic economics · Economics · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Race (biology) · Racial composition · Redistricting · Sociology · Wright · Demography · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · History · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
Congress in Black and White
Election Timing and Local Political Polarization
Disagreement driven disengagement? Policymaker perceptions of citizen identity and responsiveness to political communication
Partisan Gerrymandering and the Voting Rights Act
Revisiting Majority-Minority Districts and Black Representation
Redistricting
Secular Party Rule and Religious Violence in Pakistan
Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House
Congressmen's Voting Decisions
The Paradox of Representation
The Color of Representation
Policy Voting in the U. S. Senate
Black Faces, Black Interests
Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers
Explaining the Change in Roll-Call Voting Behavior of Southern Democrats
Partisan Representation, Realignment, and the Senate in the 1980s
A Longitudinal Analysis of Competing Explanations for the Transformation of Southern Congressional Politics
Unintended Consequences? Racial Redistricting and the Representation of Minority Interests
Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores
Issue Salience and Support for Civil Rights Legislation among Southern Democrats
Partisan Representation and the Failure of Realignment in the 1980s
Congressional Responsiveness to Constituency Change
Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress
Black Constituents and Congressional Roll Call Votes
Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation
A Social Science Approach to Race, Redistricting, and Representation
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,35 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2026 (21) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |