Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Is the Decision Not to Use Contraception an Indicator of Reproductive Agency

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10795452
AutoresMadeleine Short Fabic (0000-0001-9553-4635, Supervisory Public Health Advisor, United States Agency for International Development Washington DC 20523 USA, autor de correspondencia), Lotus Mcdougal (0000-0002-3002-0489, Assistant Professor, Center on Gender Equity and Health, Department of Medicine University of California San Diego San Diego CA USA), Anita Raj (0000-0002-8127-5123, Professor, Director of the Center on Gender Equity and Health University of California San Diego San Diego CA USA), Apoorva Jadhav (0000-0002-3627-3268, Senior Technical Advisor for Demography and Health Policy, United States Agency for International Development Washington DC 20523 USA)
Año2023
Volumen54
Número1
Páginas95-117
Fecha de publicación2023-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaStudies in Family Planning (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sifp.12235
PMID36790883
OpenAlexW4320857463
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas8
Referencias citadas40

Women's engagement in the decision to use contraception, an indicator captured in the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), is frequently used to assess women's reproductive agency. In 2014, DHS added a corollary question to the women's questionnaire on decision‐making not to use contraception. Study authors hypothesize that women's engagement in decision‐making not to use contraception is also indicative of reproductive agency. Analyzing DHS microdata from 30 countries collected between 2015 and 2020 ( n = 292,141), this country‐level study examines data quality in terms of missingness of data ( t ‐tests), indicator utility in terms of response pattern variability (descriptive statistics), and construct validity in terms of associations between engagement in the decision not to use contraception and engagement in household decision‐making (multivariable linear regression). Findings indicate the measure is of good quality, provides nuanced insight, and has construct validity. Importantly, the new measure deepens our understanding of women's reproductive agency

Agency (philosophy · Construct (python library · Construct validity · Descriptive statistics · Developmental psychology · Environmental health · Family planning · Population · Psychometrics · Reproductive health · Sociology · Statistics · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Computer Science · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Social Psychology

  • The State of Person‐Centered Measurement for Family Planning Need and Use

    Open Access•Ilene S Speizer, Elizabeth Sully et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2025

  • Exploring Adolescents’ Contraceptive Preferences and Trade‐Offs

    Open Access•Elizabeth K Harrington, Dismas Congo Ouma et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2025

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Validation of the Sexual and Reproductive Empowerment Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults in Kenya

    Open Access•Yasaman Zia, Ushma D Upadhyay et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2024

  • Traditional or Modern Contraception? Association Between Health Worker Contact and Contraceptive Choice in India

    Open Access•Nandita Bhan, Nicole E Johns et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2026

  • Moving Past a Legacy of Controlling Women

    Open Access•Christine Dehlendorf, Karen Hardee et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2025

  • Authors’ Response to “‘Supply‐Side Versus Demand‐Side Unmet Need

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Nicole Maloney et al.•Population and Development Review•2024

  • Predictive utility of key family planning indicators on dynamic contraceptive outcomes

    Open Access•Amy O Tsui, Amy Tsui et al.•Demographic Research•2024

  • The Emerge framework to measure empowerment for health and development

    Open Access•Anita Raj, A K Dey et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • Women’s Empowerment and Family Planning

    Open Access•Ndola Prata, Ashley Fraser et al.•Journal of Biosocial Science•2017

  • Examining Progress and Equity in Information Received by Women Using a Modern Method in 25 Developing Countries

    Anrudh K Jain, Jain Jain•International Perspectives on…•2016

  • Women’s Empowerment and Choice of Contraceptive Methods in Selected African Countries

    Mai Do, Nami Kurimoto•International Perspectives on…•2012

  • Women's empowerment and fertility

    Open Access•Ushma D Upadhyay, Jessica D Gipson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2014

  • Measuring Women’s Agency

    Aletheia Donald, Gayatri Koolwal et al.•Feminist Economics•2020

  • Measuring women’s decisionmaking

    Open Access•Amber Peterman, Benjamin Schwab et al.•World Development•2021

  • Contraceptive Autonomy

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz•Studies in Family Planning•2020

  • Implications for Evaluating the Impact of Family Planning Programs with a Reproductive Health Orientation

    Open Access•Anrudh K Jain, Anrudh Jain•Studies in Family Planning•2001

  • Toward a New Definition of Unmet Need for Contraception

    Open Access•Sarah D Rominski, Sarah Rominski et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2019

  • Measuring Women's Covert Use of Modern Contraception in Cross‐Sectional Surveys

    Open Access•Ifta Choiriyyah, Stan Becker•Studies in Family Planning•2018

  • Fundamental Elements of the Quality of Care

    Judith Bruce•Studies in Family Planning•1990

  • Aligning Goals, Intents, and Performance Indicators in Family Planning Service Delivery

    Open Access•Saumya RamaRao, Anrudh K Jain•Studies in Family Planning•2015

  • Incorporating Method Dissatisfaction into Unmet Need for Contraception

    Open Access•C Rothschild, Joseph Brown et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2021

  • Understanding Unmet Need

    Open Access•Sarah E K Bradley, Sarah E Bradley et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2014

  • How the Community Shapes Unmet Need for Modern Contraception

    Open Access•Nicholas Metheny, Rob Stephenson•Studies in Family Planning•2017

  • Associations between Contraceptive Decision‐Making and Marital Contraceptive Communication and use in Rural Maharashtra, India

    Open Access•Melody Nazarbegian, Sarah Averbach et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2022

  • Revising the FP Quality of Care Framework in the Context of Rights‐based Family Planning

    Open Access•Anrudh K Jain, Karen Hardee•Studies in Family Planning•2018

  • Population Policies Reconsidered

    C Alison Mcintosh, Gita Sen et al.•Population and Development Review•1994

  • Resources, Agency, Achievements

    Open Access•Naila Kabeer•Development and Change•1999

  • Organising Concepts of 'Women's Empowerment' for Measurement

    Open Access•Lu Gram, Joanna Morrison et al.•Social Indicators Research•2019

Obras citantes distintas8
Citas por año4
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 8
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae