Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Developing the “120 by 20” Goal for the Global FP2020 Initiative

Bibliographic Data

ID10795656
AuthorsJoseph Brown (0000-0002-3602-1351, Gates Foundation, corresponding author), Win Brown (Senior Program Officer, Family Planning Program, Global Policy and Advocacy Division Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation P.O. Box 23350 Seattle WA 98102), Nel Druce (Senior Health Advisor, Department for International Development London UK), Julia Bunting (Director, Programmes & Technical International Planned Parenthood Federation London UK), Scott Radloff (Senior Scholar and Director / PMA2020, Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD), Desmond Koroma (Technical Specialist, Planning, Monitoring & Reporting UNFPA New York NY), Srishti Gupta (0009-0009-5004-4865, Senior Expert McKinsey & Company Boston MA), Brian Siems (Program Manager, Global Policy and Advocacy Division Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation P.O. Box 23350 Seattle WA 98102), Monica Reid Kerrigan (0000-0001-6641-7034, Gates Foundation), Monica Kerrigan (Deputy Director, Family Planning Program, Global Policy and Advocacy Division Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation P.O. Box 23350 Seattle WA 98102), Dan Kress (Deputy Director, Global Policy and Advocacy Division Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation P.O. Box 23350 Seattle WA 98102), Gary L Darmstadt (0000-0002-7522-5824, Senior Fellow, Global Development Division, Global Policy and Advocacy Division Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation P.O. Box 23350 Seattle WA 98102)
Year2014
Volume45
Issue1
Pages73-84
Publication date2014-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Family Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00377.x
PMID24615576
OpenAlexW2089197787
LanguageEN
Citations received38
References cited8

This report describes the purpose for developing a quantitative goal for the London Summit on Family Planning held in July 2012, the methodology behind its formulation, and the lessons learned in the process. The London Summit has evolved into the global initiative known as FP2020, and the goal has become “120 by 20,” or reaching 120 million additional users of modern contraceptive methods by 2020 in the world's poorest countries. The success of FP2020 will first be evaluated on the basis of quantitative verification to determine that the “120 by 20” goal was reached. More important, however, is the extent to which the goal today serves as a global rallying cry to mobilize resources and leadership around current family planning programs, with a focus on voluntary family planning and quality of care, and with an emphasis on meeting girls' and women's unmet needs and their right to practice contraception. We hope this article provides greater transparency and understanding of the FP2020 goal, and that the global goal spurs annual monitoring of progress toward national goals in the world's poorest countries

Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Family planning · Geography · Political science · Population · Program evaluation · Public relations · Research methodology · Summit · Transparency (behavior · Global Health Care Issues · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine · Public Administration

  • Do Indian women receive adequate information about contraception?

    Open Access•Juel Rana, Anrudh K Jain•Journal of Biosocial Science•2020

  • Information About Methods Received by Contraceptive Users in India

    Open Access•Anrudh K Jain•Journal of Biosocial Science•2017

  • Family planning exemplar country selection methodology

    Open Access•Zahid Memon, Abeer Mian et al.•BMJ Global Health•2026

  • Share of current unmet need for modern contraceptive methods attributed to past users of these methods in India

    Open Access•Ankita Shukla, Anrudh K Jain et al.•Journal of Biosocial Science•2021

  • Unmet Need for Family Planning in Sri Lanka

    Deborah S Degraff, K A P Siddhisena•International Perspectives on…•2015

  • Women’s marital status and use of family planning services across male- and female-headed households in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Franciele Hellwig, Ghada E Saad et al.•Journal of Global Health•2023

  • “It makes the buzz” – putting the demographic dividend under scrutiny

    Open Access•Michael Hilbig, Elke Loichinger et al.•Geographica Helvetica•2022

  • Trends and Drivers of Unmet Need for Family Planning in Currently Married Tanzanian Women between 1999 and 2016

    Open Access•Abdon Gregory Rwabilimbo, Kedir Yimam Ahmed et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Impact of the village health center project on contraceptive behaviors in rural Jordan

    Open Access•Makiko Komasawa, Masae Yuasa et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Sub-national levels and trends in contraceptive prevalence, unmet need, and demand for family planning in Nigeria with survey uncertainty

    Open Access•Laina D Mercer, Fred Lu et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Modern contraceptive availability and stockouts

    Open Access•Pierre Muhoza, Alain K Koffi et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2021

  • Targets and technologies

    Daniel Bendix, Ellen E Foley et al.•Gender Place & Culture•2019

  • Supply-Side Versus Demand-Side Unmet Need

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Nicole Maloney et al.•Population and Development Review•2022

  • The effect of a postpartum intrauterine device programme on choice of contraceptive method in Tanzania

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Natasha Sokol et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2023

  • What is the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion availability and legality? Evidence from a national sample of women and facilities in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Linnea A Zimmerman, Cary Karp et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2023

  • How Do We Measure Contraceptive Method Preferences? Evidence From a Scoping Review

    Open Access•Carolina Cardona, Jamila Asker et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2025

  • Measuring family planning quality and its link with contraceptive use in public facilities in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda

    Open Access•Timothee Fruhauf, Linnea A Zimmerman et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2018

  • Assessing the contraceptive supply environment in Kinshasa, DRC

    Open Access•Saleh Babazadeh, S Lea et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2018

  • Empowered, Smaller Families Are Better for the Planet

    Open Access•Céline Delacroix, Robert Engelman•Social Change•2023

  • Contraceptive Autonomy

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz•Studies in Family Planning•2020

  • The Evolution of Family Planning Programs

    Open Access•John Bongaarts•Studies in Family Planning•2019

  • FPwatch

    Open Access•Saleh Babazadeh, Katherine Thanel et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2018

  • Meeting Preferences for Specific Contraceptive Methods

    Open Access•Kristen Lagasse Burke, J E Potter•Studies in Family Planning•2023

  • Revitalizing the ICPD Programme of Action on the International Development Agenda

    Open Access•Andrzej Kulczycki•Studies in Family Planning•2025

  • Demographic and Fertility Characteristics of Contraceptive Clusters in Burundi

    Open Access•Kerry L D MacQuarrie, Courtney Allen et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2021

  • Aligning Goals, Intents, and Performance Indicators in Family Planning Service Delivery

    Open Access•Saumya RamaRao, Anrudh K Jain•Studies in Family Planning•2015

  • Incorporating Method Dissatisfaction into Unmet Need for Contraception

    Open Access•C Rothschild, Joseph Brown et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2021

  • Global Contraceptive Failure Rates

    Open Access•Sarah E K Bradley, Sarah E Bradley et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2019

  • Integrating Population, Health, and Environment Programs with Contraceptive Distribution in Rural Ethiopia

    Open Access•Lianne Gonsalves, Samuel E Donovan et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2015

  • Stop or Switch

    Open Access•Dana O Sarnak, Alison Gemmill et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2023

  • They Destroy the Reproductive System”

    Open Access•Erica Sedlander, Jeffrey B Bingenheimer et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2018

  • Aligning Funding and Need for Family Planning

    Open Access•Victoria Y Fan, Sunja Kim et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2017

  • Setting Ambitious yet Achievable Targets Using Probabilistic Projections

    Open Access•Vladimíra Kantorová, Jin Rou New et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2017

  • Fertility Has Been Framed

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Taryn M Valley et al.•Studies in Comparative…•2025

  • Population Control in the Troubled Present

    Open Access•Anne Hendrixson•Development and Change•2019

  • Contraceptive Practice in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Amy O Tsui, Joseph Brown et al.•Population and Development Review•2017

  • I was obligated to accept

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Thirty years of 'strange bedmates

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Rishita Nandagiri•Population Studies•2025

  • Family planning

    Open Access•John G F Cleland, John Cleland et al.•The Lancet•2006

  • National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015

    Leontine Alkema, Vladimíra Kantorová et al.•The Lancet•2013

  • Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000–10)

    Open Access•Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Mickey Chopra et al.•The Lancet•2010

  • The Millennium Development Goals Report 2013

    United Nations•The Millennium Development Goals…•2013

Unique citing works38
Citations per year3,45
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 36
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae