The Role of Couple Negotiation in Unmet Need for Contraception and the Decision to Stop Childbearing in Uganda

Bibliographic Data

ID10797362
AuthorsBrent Wolff (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, corresponding author), Ann K Blanc, John Ssekamatte‐Ssebuliba
Year2000
Volume31
Issue2
Pages124-137
Publication date2000-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Family Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00124.x
PMID10907278
OpenAlexW1976018943
LanguageEN
Citations received48
References cited15

This study uses survey and focus‐group data from the 1995–96 Negotiating Reproductive Outcomes study in Uganda to describe the nature of the decision to stop childbearing and to question the simplifying assumption of consensus decisionmaking implicit in much demographic research on unmet need. Negotiation is characterized in four stages, from normative precedent for decisionmaking to communication, disagreement, and conflict resolution. Indirect forms of communication between partners predominate, contributing to the tendency of both men and women to overestimate each other's demand for additional children. Partner opposition is found to cause a statistically significant increase in unmet need reported by women and a shift in contraceptive mix favoring use of traditional methods over modern methods. For women, partner opposition may account for as much as 20 percent of unmet need in urban areas, 12 percent in rural areas, and 15 percent overall

Conflict resolution · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Family planning · Fertility · Focus group · Negotiation · Normative · Opposition (politics · Political science · Population · Research methodology · Sociology · Demography · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Global Maternal and Child Health · Law · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Psychology · Social Psychology