Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Demand for Self-Managed Medication Abortion Through an Online Telemedicine Service in the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID11018422
AuthorsAbigail R A Aiken (0000-0002-1555-3025, Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), Jennifer E Starling (0000-0003-4765-360X, Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), Alexandra van der Wal (Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), Sascha van der Vliet (Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), Kathleen Broussard (0000-0002-6312-7207, Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), Dana M Johnson (0000-0001-5512-7947, Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), Elisa Padron (0000-0001-7620-2942, Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), Rebecca Gomperts (0000-0001-5937-251X, Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), John G Scott (0000-0002-0744-0688, Abigail R. A. Aiken and Dana M. Johnson are with the LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. Jennifer E. Starling and James G. Scott are with the Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin. Alexandra van der Wal and Sascha van der Vliet are with the Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam. Kathleen Broussard is with the Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin. Elisa Padron is with the College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas,...), James G Scott (0000-0002-2374-960X, The University of Texas at Austin)
Year2020
Volume110
Issue1
Pages90-97
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2019.305369
PMID31622157
OpenAlexW2980962265
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited24

Objectives. To examine demand for abortion medications through an online telemedicine service in the United States. Methods. We examined requests from US residents to the online telemedicine abortion service Women on Web (WoW) between October 15, 2017, and August 15, 2018. We calculated the population-adjusted rate of requests by state and examined the demographics, clinical characteristics, and motivations of those seeking services, comparing those in states with hostile versus supportive abortion policy climates. Results. Over 10 months, WoW received 6022 requests from US residents; 76% from hostile states. Mississippi had the highest rate of requests (24.9 per 100 000 women of reproductive age). In both hostile and supportive states, a majority (60%) reported a combination of barriers to clinic access and preferences for self-management. Cost was the most common barrier (71% in hostile states; 63% in supportive states; P Conclusions. Demand for self-managed medication abortion through online telemedicine is prevalent in the United States. There is a public health justification to make these abortions as safe, effective, and supported as possible

Abortion · Business · Demographics · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Medical abortion · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Public health · Reproductive health · Service (business) · Telemedicine · Demography · Law · Marketing · Medicine · Nursing · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Sexual function and dysfunction studies

  • The economic context of pursuing online medication abortion in the United States

    Open Access•Dana M Johnson, Melissa Madera et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2021

  • Invisible by law

    Open Access•Gina Paola Escobar Cuero•Frontiers in Human Dynamics•2025

  • Covid ‐19 and Independent Abortion Providers

    Open Access•Sarah C M Robert, Rosalyn Schroeder et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2020

  • I'm going to be forced to have a baby”

    Open Access•Laura Jacques, Taryn M Valley et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2023

  • Medicaid's role in alleviating some of the financial burden of abortion

    Open Access•Rachel K Jones•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2024

  • Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision

    Open Access•Brandon L Crawford, Megan Simmons et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2023

  • Racial and Ethnic Abortion Disparities Following Georgia's 22-Week Gestational Age Limit

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Mosley, Sara K Redd et al.•Women s Health Issues•2021

  • Abortion Clients’ Perceptions of Alternative Medication Abortion Service Delivery Options in Mississippi

    Open Access•Klaira Lerma, Whitney Arey et al.•Women s Health Issues•2023

  • Perceptions of Abortion Legality and Availability in Mississippi Before the Fall of Roe

    Open Access•Klaira Lerma, Angela Nagle et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2023

  • Exploring Attitudes About the Legality of Self-Managed Abortion in the US

    Open Access•Sarah Raifman, M Antonia Biggs et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2021

  • Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States

    Open Access•T A Weitz•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2024

  • U.S. Abortion Care Providers’ Perspectives on Self-Managed Abortion

    Open Access•Adrienne Baldwin, Dana M Johnson et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2022

  • Patient Acceptability of Telehealth Medication Abortion Care in the United States, 2021‒2022

    Leah R Koenig, Jennifer Ko et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2024

  • Disruptions to Abortion Care in Louisiana During Early Months of the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Sarah C M Robert, Sarah C M Roberts et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2021

  • The Growing Importance of Self-Managed and Telemedicine Abortion in the United States

    Patty Skuster, Heidi Moseson•American Journal of Public Health•2022

  • The Pregnancy-Related Mortality Impact of a Total Abortion Ban in the United States

    Open Access•Arthur J Stevenson•Demography•2021

  • Legal geographies of medication abortion in the USA

    Open Access•Sydney Calkin•Transactions of the Institute of…•2021

  • Strategic (Non)Disclosure

    Open Access•Kathleen Broussard•Journal of Health and Social…•2024

  • It makes it more real

    Open Access•Andréa Becker, Lena R Hann•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Travel for Abortion Services in Alabama and Delays Obtaining Care

    Open Access•Kari White, Janet M Turan et al.•Women s Health Issues•2017

  • Abortion Patients' Experience and Perceptions of Waiting Periods

    Open Access•Deborah Karasek, Sarah C M Robert et al.•Women s Health Issues•2015

  • Motivations and Experiences of People Seeking Medication Abortion Online in the United States

    Open Access•Abigail R A Aiken, Kathleen Broussard et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2018

  • Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014

    Open Access•Rachel K Jones, Jenna Jerman•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2017

  • Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas

    Caitlin Gerdts, Liza Fuentes et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2022

  • Dramatic Decreases in US Abortion Rates

    Diana Greene Foster•American Journal of Public Health•2017

  • Changes in Service Delivery Patterns After Introduction of Telemedicine Provision of Medical Abortion in Iowa

    Daniel Grossman, Daniel A Grossman et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2013

  • Self-induction of abortion among women in the United States

    Daniel Grossman, Kelsey Holt et al.•Reproductive Health Matters•2010

  • Self-management of medical abortion

    Megan Wainwright, C J Colvin et al.•Reproductive Health Matters•2016

Unique citing works19
Citations per year3,17
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae