Factors predictive of sexual violence

Testing the four pillars of the Confluence Model in a large diverse sample of college men

Bibliographic Data

ID11106962
AuthorsNeil M Malamuth (0000-0002-4742-3487, Departments of Communication and Psychology University of California Los Angeles California USA, corresponding author), Raina V Lamade (0000-0001-8030-9881, Department of Psychology University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts USA), Mary P Ko (0000-0001-9317-9318, College of Public Health University of Arizona Tuscon Arizona USA), Mary P Koss, Elise Lopez (0000-0002-5955-314X, College of Public Health University of Arizona Tuscon Arizona USA), Christopher Seaman (Office of Budget & Planning University of California Santa Barbara California USA), Robert Prentky (School of Psychology Fairleigh Dickinson University Teaneck New Jersey USA), Robert A Prentky (Fairleigh Dickinson University)
Year2021
Volume47
Issue4
Pages405-420
Publication date2021-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAggressive Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0096-140X • E-ISSN: 1098-2337
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ab.21960
PMID33719096
OpenAlexW3135979404
LanguageEN
Citations received34
References cited45

This article focuses on the characteristics of sexually violent men who have not been convicted of a crime. The objective of this study was to test the four key interrelated pillars of the Confluence Model. The first key pillar posits the interaction of Hostile Masculinity and Impersonal Sex as core risk predictors. The second pillar entails a "mediated structure" wherein the impact of more general risk factors is mediated via those specific to aggression against women. The third pillar comprises a single latent factor underlying various types of sexual violence. The fourth pillar expands the core model by including the secondary risk factors of lower empathy, peer support, extreme pornography use, and participation in alcohol parties. An ethnically diverse sample of 1,148 male students from 13 U.S. colleges and universities completed a comprehensive survey that assessed the hypothesized risk factors and self-reported sexual violence, which included noncontact sexual offenses, contact sexual coercion, and contact sexual aggression. A series of multiple regression analyses were conducted before testing structural equation models. The results supported the integration of the four pillars within a single expanded empirical model that accounted for 49% of the variance of sexual violence. This study yielded data supporting all four key pillars. These findings provide information about non-redudant risk factors that can be used to develop screening tools, group-based and individually tailored psychoeducational and treatment interventions

Aggression · Medical emergency · Poison control · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Sexual coercion · Clinical Psychology · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology