McClure's ‘Mutual Obligation’ and Pearson's ‘Reciprocity’ – Can They Be Reconciled
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11228811 |
|---|---|
| Authors | T Rowse (0000-0003-3602-5966, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 263-276 |
| Publication date | 2002-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2002.tb01121.x |
| OpenAlex | W118623216 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 1 |
Citation · Library science · Obligation · Political science · Publication · Publishing · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology · Social science · Sociology · Australian History and Society · Computer Science · Irish and British Studies · Law
Children and Families
From meeting needs and establishing entitlements to enforcing obligations
Partnership for improving outcomes in Indigenous education
Indigenous Policy and Mutual Obligation
Discursive Representation and Pearson's Quest for a Radical Centre
On gammon, global noise and indigenous heterogeneity
Aboriginal 'Difference' and 'Autonomy' Then and Now
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2013 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |