Evaluating Education Governance
Does State Takeover of School Districts Affect Student Achievement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11680396 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Beth E Schueler (0000-0002-6267-0793, corresponding author), Joshua Bleiberg (0000-0003-0291-3244), Joshua F Bleiberg |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 162-192 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0276-8739 • E-ISSN: 1520-6688 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/pam.22338 |
| OpenAlex | W3165346671 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 21 |
Local school boards have primary authority for running educational systems in the U.S., but little is known empirically about the merits of this arrangement. State takeovers of struggling districts represent a rare alternative form of educational governance and have become an increasingly common response to low performance. However, limited research explores whether this effectively improves student outcomes. We track all takeovers nationwide from the late 1980s, when the first takeovers occurred, through 2016 and describe takeover districts. While these districts are low performing, we find academic performance plays less of a role in predicting takeover for districts serving larger concentrations of African American students. We then use a new data source allowing for cross‐state comparisons of student outcomes to estimate the effect of takeovers that occurred between 2011 and 2016. On average, we find no evidence that takeover generates academic benefits. Takeover appears to be disruptive in the early years of takeover, particularly to English Language Arts achievement, although the longer‐term effects are less clear. We also observe considerable heterogeneity of effects across districts. Takeovers were least effective in districts with higher baseline achievement and least harmful in majority‐Hispanic communities. Leaders should be cautious about using state takeover without considering local context and a better understanding of why some takeovers are more effective than others
Academic achievement · Affect (linguistics · Business · Corporate governance · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · State (computer science · Student achievement · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Psychology · School Leadership and Teacher Performance · Finance
Framing State Power
Not Like Us
Who Leads Turnaround Schools? Characteristics of Principals in Tennessee's Achievement School District and Innovation Zones
Outward portrayals of equity
Beyond the Parameters of “Choice”
What Are the Side Effects of School Turnaround? A Systematic Review
Cooperation or conquest
Prepare yourself for the change”
Centralization and Long-Term System Performance
The state takeover of the Camden City District schools and students’ academic performance
Déjà Vu
Decree or democracy? State takeovers and local government financial outcomes
The Impact of School District Turnaround on Postsecondary Outcomes
Teachers Are Not Lemons
Emotional Impact of State Takeovers
Can States Sustain and Replicate School District Improvement? Evidence from Massachusetts on Multilevel Governance
Improving Low-Performing Schools
Do the Effects Persist? An Examination of Long-Term Effects After Students Leave Turnaround Schools
Contracting Whiteness
Boiling the Frog Slowly
The New Education Politics in the United States
Takeover
Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research
Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Mostly Harmless Econometrics
Measuring the Effectiveness of City and State Takeover as a School Reform Strategy
The Problem With “Proficiency”
School District Reform in Newark
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |