Will empowering developers to challenge exclusionary zoning increase suburban housing choice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11683403 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Mitchell (0000-0003-2500-1686, corresponding author), James L Mitchell (0000-0003-4505-2923) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 119-134 |
| Publication date | 2003-11-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0276-8739 • E-ISSN: 1520-6688 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/pam.10182 |
| OpenAlex | W2075464568 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 12 |
The municipal zoning process in the United States has come under increasing attack as a tool to create and maintain suburban socioeconomic homogeneity by mandating sprawl‐producing single‐family detached houses at the expense of less costly townhouses, apartments, and mobile homes. Beginning in the 1970s, the Supreme Courts of the neighboring states of Pennsylvania and New Jersey addressed municipal exclusionary zoning in different ways: Pennsylvania empowered residential developers to compel municipalities practicing exclusionary zoning to authorize market‐rate development of all types of housing, while developer empowerment in New Jersey was conditioned upon inclusion of low‐ and moderate‐income units. Using aerial survey and housing census data over a 20‐year period, this article finds that outcomes by housing type over a 20‐year period in Pennsylvania municipalities around Philadelphia were more diverse than those in adjacent New Jersey municipalities. © 2004 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management
Affordable housing · Business · Census · Civil engineering · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Gentrification · Geography · Land use · Political science · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Urban sprawl · Zoning · Engineering · Housing Market and Economics · Law · Public Administration · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Urbanization and City Planning
Inclusionary regimes, firm size, and housing approval by cities
The Reversal of Mount Laurel’s Regional Contribution Agreements and the Impact on White-Black Academic Achievement Gaps Across New Jersey
The Efficacy of Allocating Housing Growth in the Los Angeles Region (2006–2014)
Exclusionary Zoning and the Limits of Judicial Impact
You don’t need zoning to be exclusionary
Can state law combat exclusionary zoning? Evidence from Massachusetts
Density Zoning and Class Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas
Race, spatial mismatch, and job accessibility
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,44 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2026 (19) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |