Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The issues are the issue

Intangible salience and war duration

Bibliographic Data

ID11895045
AuthorsDouglas B Atkinson (0000-0003-4628-1664, University of Salzburg, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume47
Issue6
Pages1016-1039
Publication date2021-08-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Interactions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0305-0629 • E-ISSN: 1547-7444
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03050629.2021.1954637
OpenAlexW3196084019
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited49

While it has long been acknowledged that issues play an important role in conflict processes, research on war duration has paid insufficient attention to them. In this paper, I help to remedy this deficiency by devising an original theory concerning the role of issues in war. I do this by focusing on the tangibility of the issues under dispute. I contend as the intangible salience increases, the more difficult it will be for states to bring their wars to an end. Ultimately, the more intangible salience that the issues possess, the longer wars will be. I use a mixed-methods approach. In the quantitative analysis, I employ original measures of intangible salience using data from a world-wide expert survey as well as new data on issues fought over during war. In the qualitative portion, I perform an in-depth case study on the effects of the issues on the war duration during the Vietnam War. Ultimately, I find strong support for my assertions that the issues lead states to engage in war prolongation behavior which in turn leads to longer wars

Cognitive psychology · Duration (music · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Salience (neuroscience · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Dangerous Development

    Chase LaSpisa•International Interactions•2025

  • Military Labor Systems, Domestic Politics, and the Battlefield

    Open Access•Douglas B Atkinson, Kevin Fahey et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • Under God, indivisible? Religious salience and interstate territorial conflict

    Open Access•Ariel Zellman, Jonathan Fox•Journal of Peace Research•2024

  • Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies

    Gary Goertz•Multimethod Research, Causal…•2017

  • Negotiating Peace

    Paul R Pillar•Negotiating Peace•2014

  • The Vietnam War from the Other Side

    Cheng Guan Ang•Vietnam War from the Other Side•2013

  • The War Puzzle Revisited

    Open Access•John A Vasquez•War Puzzle Revisited•2009

  • War and Punishment

    H E Goemans•War and Punishment•2000

  • How Wars End

    Dan Reiter•How Wars End•2009

  • Democracies at War

    Dan Reiter, Allan C Stam et al.•Democracies at War•2002

  • The Correlates of War (Cow) Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.0

    Open Access•Douglas M Stinnett, Douglas Stinnett et al.•Conflict Management and Peace…•2002

  • Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy

    Open Access•Stacie E Goddard•Indivisible Territory and the…•2009

  • Southeast Asia and the Vietnam War

    Cheng Guan Ang•Southeast Asia and the Vietnam War•2009

  • Peace and War

    Open Access•K J Holsti•Peace and War•1991

  • The Pursuit of Victory

    Richard L Russell, Brian Bond•The Journal of Military History•1997

  • Emotion and Strategic Learning in War

    Open Access•Thomas M Dolan•Foreign Policy Analysis•2014

  • Uneven Ground

    Ariel Zellman•Security Studies•2018

  • Charting A Course To Conflict

    Open Access•Paul R Hensel•Conflict Management and Peace…•1996

  • Issue indivisibility and territorial claims

    Open Access•Paul R Hensel, Stephen Mark Mitchell et al.•GeoJournal•2005

  • Grounds for War

    Dominic D P Johnson, Dominic Johnson et al.•International Security•2014

  • How the Weak Win Wars

    Ivan Arreguín-Toft•International Security•2001

  • The Path to Intractability

    Ron E Hassner•International Security•2007

  • Lyndon Johnson's War

    Robert A Divine, Barry Berman•Journal of American History•1990

  • No Peace, No Honor

    Philip Zelikow, Larry Berman•Foreign Affairs•2001

  • Conflict Management in Land, River, and Maritime Claims

    Open Access•Andrew P Owsiak, Stephen Mark Mitchell et al.•Political Science Research and…•2019

  • Bones of Contention

    Open Access•Paul R Hensel, Stephen Mark Mitchell et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2008

  • Bargaining and the Nature of War

    Open Access•Alastair Smith, Allan C Stam et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004

  • Settling It on the Field

    Open Access•Kristopher W Ramsay, Kristopher Ramsay•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2008

  • Bordering on Peace

    Open Access•Douglas M Gibler•International Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Does Attrition Behavior Help Explain the Duration of Interstate Wars? A Game Theoretic and Empirical Analysis

    Open Access•Catherine C Langlois, Jean-Pierre P Langlois•International Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Learning from the Battlefield

    Open Access•Alex Weisiger•International Organization•2016

  • Rationalist explanations for war

    Open Access•James D Fearon•International Organization•1995

  • War as a Commitment Problem

    Robert Powell•International Organization•2006

  • Polity IV, 1800-1999

    Open Access•Monty G Marshall, Ted Robert Gurr et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2002

  • How Initiators End Their Wars

    Open Access•Branislav L Slantchev•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Does the Principle of Convergence Really Hold? War, Uncertainty and the Failure of Bargaining

    Open Access•Jean-Pierre P Langlois, Catherine C Langlois•British Journal of Political…•2012

  • Issue Indivisibility and Time Horizons as Rationalist Explanations for War

    Monica Duffy Toft•Security Studies•2006

  • Understanding Process Tracing

    Open Access•Donald Collier, David Collier•PS Political Science & Politics•2011

  • Brothers at War

    Gebru Tareke, Tekeste Negash et al.•The International Journal of…•2001

  • What Are They Fighting For? The Importance of Issues in International Conflict Research

    Open Access•Paul F Diehl•Journal of Peace Research•1992

  • The Tangibility of Issues and Global Conflict

    Open Access•John A Vasquez•Journal of Peace Research•1983

  • The Principle of Convergence in Wartime Negotiations

    Open Access•Branislav L Slantchev•American Political Science Review•2003

  • The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816-1985

    Open Access•D Scott Bennett, Allan C Stam et al.•American Political Science Review•1996

  • The Power to Hurt

    Branislav L Slantchev•American Political Science Review•2003

  • The Decider's Dilemma

    Open Access•Sarah E Croco•American Political Science Review•2011

  • The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•James Mahoney•Sociological Methods & Research•2012

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae