Science and Technology Studies on Trial
Dilemmas of Expertise
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11924734 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Lynch (0000-0002-8635-6547, Cornell University, corresponding author), Michael S Lynch (0000-0002-1016-5090, Department of Science and Technology Studies at Cornell University), Shelley A Cole (0000-0002-1709-6219, University of California, Irvine, corresponding author), Simon Cole (University of California, Irvine) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 269-311 |
| Publication date | 2005-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Studies of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0306312705048715 |
| OpenAlex | W2026707433 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 56 |
| References cited | 66 |
This paper discusses materials from a legal case, People v. Hyatt (2001). This was a criminal case in which one of the authors (Simon Cole) agreed to appear as an expert witness for the defense. Cole’s expertise derived from his research in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS), and so his appearance in the case exemplified STS research engaging in a public controversy about a contested form of ‘scientific’ knowledge. Cole’s STS work and his testimony proved useful to defendants seeking to restrict the admissibility of forensic fingerprint evidence in court, but before he could testify in the Hyatt trial, his own expertise was subjected to an admissibility hearing. During his testimony, Cole faced a number of dilemmas as he attempted to accommodate his own conception of science and STS with the terms and procedures recognized by the court. The hearing was transcribed, and the coauthors of this paper discussed the details of the transcript. Their discussion itself was recorded and transcribed, and portions of the two transcripts are juxtaposed in this paper. The paper discusses Cole’s difficulties and the dilemmas they exemplify, as a situated demonstration of some of the difficulties STS scholars face in their attempts to engage the ‘public sphere’
Epistemology · Expert witness · Face (sociological concept · Field (mathematics · Political science · Situated · Social science · Sociology · Witness · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Computer Science · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence
Estudios sobre ciencia, tecnología y sociedad
Citizen participation and technology
Designing technology for legal work
How the Law Learns in the Digital Society
A Cautionary Tale About Cautionary Tales About Intervention
Does STS Mean Business
Engaging Boundary Objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the Subtleties of Layered Engagement
Why Popper can’t resolve the debate over global warming
Drinking Water Quality in Indian Water Policies, Laws, and Courtrooms
Behavioral Visibility
Jouer l’expert à la barre
On conveying and not conveying expertise
No funeral bells
STS, Ethics, and Knowledge Transfer in the Courtroom
Judges’ socio-technical review of contested expertise
Ontography
Witnessing Creation
Competition in the Wild
Regulatory Objectivity in Action
Anti-social Epistemologies
The politics of care in technoscience
A Contextual Approach to the Admissibility of the State's Forensic Science and Medical Evidence
Hydropower infrastructure and regional order making in the Sub-Mekong region
The Sociologist as Expert Witness
The emerging role of lawyers as addiction ‘quasi-experts’
Being a Consistent Pain in the Ass”
Nano-hydroxyapatite Before the Science Court
The scalpel, the calculator and the judge in France
Science, Technology, Society, and Law
Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images
Renegotiating forensic cultures
Performing self on the witness stand
Technological Agency in the Co-Constitution of Legal Expertise and the US Drone Program
Staying the Course
Organizations in the making
What caused the flood? Controversy and closure in the Hurricane Katrina disaster
From Ruse to Farce
Caught inside the black box
Behind the Screens
Doing Justice and Demonstrating Fairness in Small Claims Arbitration
Demonstrating “Reasonable Fear” at Trial
Social Constructivism in Science and Technology Studies
Working Knowledge
Public Engagement, Knowledge Transfer, and Impact Validity
Analytical categories to describe imaginations about the collective futures
Public engagement in biosciences and biotechnologies
Are you asking me or are you telling me
Intersectionality and Science and Technology Studies
Kids are Kids
Science and Technology Studies in Policy
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court
Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room
Making an Issue out of a Standard
Knowing How to Sleepwalk
O resgate da epistemologia1
Producing Absolute Truth
Science in Context
Text in context
Changing order
Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action
Suspect Identities
Cultural Boundaries of Science
Order in Court
Cordelia’s Love
The practice turn in contemporary theory
Studies in ethnomethodology
The Ambivalence of Scientists
The Next Step or Moonwalking? Expert Evidence, the Public Understanding of Science and the Case against Imwinkelried's Didactic Trial Procedures
Multiple personality disorder and its hosts
Towards a Sociology of Measurement
Contested Identities
Constructing Expertise
The Politics of Symmetry
Breaking the Waves in Science Studies
Sticking a Needle into Science
The Discursive Production of Uncertainty
The Third Wave of Science Studies
Witnessing Identification
Legal Engineering
Beyond Epistemology
King Canute Meets the Beach Boys
Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism
Science Studies and Activism
Litigation Life
Response to the Commentary
Commentary
Setting Boundaries between Science and Law
Commentary
Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge
The Reflexive Thesis
A Parting of the Ways
Knowledge and Reflexivity
More Sauce Please! The Politics of SSK
Theory, culture and society
Aramis
Representing the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Law
Celebration and Strategy
The Need for Public Intellectuals
On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology
Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive
Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science
Land of Hope and Glory
The Law-Set
Captives of Controversy
The Scientific Ethos
The Politics of Observation
Norms and ideology in science
The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy
Rhetoric of Motives
Situated Knowledges
Science at the Bar
Normal Crimes
Credibility as an Interactional Accomplishment
On the Proper Status of Unspeakably Bad Objects
Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge
Women's History Goes to Trial
| Unique citing works | 56 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,8 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 55 |