International fieldwork as skills development
An exploratory study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11955413 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hiroshi Ito (0000-0001-7611-9292, NUCB Business School, Nagoya University of Business and Commerce, Nagoya, Japan, corresponding author), Chisato Igano (0000-0001-7882-4171, College of Arts and Sciences, J. F. Oberlin University, Machida, Japan) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 417-434 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Geography in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-8265 • E-ISSN: 1466-1845 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03098265.2020.1836481 |
| OpenAlex | W3096452999 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 51 |
The current study examined the impacts of a Japanese university’s international fieldwork programs on developing the higher-order thinking skills and attributes of the students who participated in the programs in the Philippines and India. Through students’ self-evaluation questionnaires, the study compared the reported scores of these skills and attributes both before and after the fieldwork programs. The findings suggested that the fieldwork programs seem to have significantly contributed to improving critical thinking and problem-solving skills as well as adaptability. However, other skills and attributes did not improve significantly. The current study also explored the possible reasons for the positive, neutral, and negative impacts of the fieldwork programs through an analysis of the findings from a series of focus group interviews with the students. While the majority of the skills and attributes did not show significant improvement, the current research may have important implications. Indeed, students’ responses from the focus group interviews suggest a more positive development of skills and attributes than was revealed by the self-evaluation questionnaires. The possible reasons for this discrepancy were also explored
Adaptability · Critical thinking · Exploratory research · Focus group · Higher education · Higher-Order Thinking · Management · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Study Skills · Teaching method · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Geography Education and Pedagogy · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Medicine · Psychology
Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory and Its Application in Geography in Higher Education
Engaging online learners
Overseas Student Teaching
Adaptability in the workplace
Curiosity and Exploration
Participatory Workshops
The dual imperatives of action research
An Evaluation of Foreign Fieldwork in Promoting Deep Learning
Focus group methodology
Examining the Role of the Instructor in Problem-centered Instruction
Examining Trends in International Study
Facilitating international fieldwork
Promoting and Assessing ‘Deep Learning’ in Geography Fieldwork
International Perspectives on Fieldcourses
Gaining a “sense of place”
International Perspectives on the Effectiveness of Geography Fieldwork for Learning
Toward securing a future for geography graduates
Going Global? Long-Haul Fieldwork in Undergraduate Geography
Encouraging reflexivity in urban geography fieldwork
The Importance of Direct Experience
Riding the rip”
The Non-Geographer
A curriculum framework for faculty-led international programs in geography
European Geography Higher Education Fieldwork and the Skills Agenda
Students as Tour Guides
Geographic contributions to institutional curriculum reform in Australia
Fieldwork is Good
Pedagogical benefits of fieldwork of the students at the Faculty of Geography in the light of the Bologna Process
The perceived influence of travel experiences on learning generic skills
Transformational Potential of Focus Group Practice in Participatory Action Research
Problem-based learning in Asian universities
The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities
How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |