On Methods and Marshmallows

A Roadmap for Science That Is Openly Feminist and Radically Open

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12003641
AutoresSarah J Gervai (0000-0002-2667-6370, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA, autor correspondente), Amanda E Baildon (0000-0001-5564-4581, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA), Tierney K Lorenz (0000-0002-4999-1584, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA)
Ano2021
Volume45
Fascículo4
Páginas430-447
Data de publicação2021-08-19
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPsychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/03616843211032632
OpenAlexW3195522527
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas99

In this commentary, we argue that feminist science and open science can benefit from each other’s wisdom and critiques in service of creating systems that produce the highest quality science with the maximum potential for improving the lives of women. To do this, we offer a constructive analysis, focusing on common methods used in open science, including open materials and data, preregistration, and large sample sizes, and illuminate potential benefits and costs from a feminist science perspective. We also offer some solutions and deeper questions both for individual researchers and the feminist psychology and open science communities. By broadening our focus from a myopic prioritization of certain methodological and analytic approaches in open science, we hope to give a balanced perspective of science that emerges from each movement’s strengths and is openly feminist and radically open

Constructive · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Feminism · Open Science · Perspective (graphical · Quality (philosophy · Service (business · Sociology · Computer Science · Data Analysis and Archiving · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Gender Studies · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology