Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

De‐escalation after repeated negative feedback

Emergent expectations of failure

Bibliographic Data

ID12166264
AuthorsBrian J Zikmund-Fisher (0000-0002-1637-4176, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, corresponding author), Brian J Zikmund‐Fisher
Year2004
Volume17
Issue5
Pages365-379
Publication date2004-11-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.478
OpenAlexW2040759135
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

Research on willingness to make marginal investments (e.g., the escalation and sunk cost literatures) has often focused on project completion decisions, such as the “radar‐blank plane.” This paper discusses a fundamentally different type of marginal investment decision, that of couples deciding whether to continue infertility treatment in the face of repeated failures. Two experiments based on this context show that when people face multiple independent chances to achieve a valued goal but are unsure about chances of success, premature quitting or “de‐escalation” is the norm. Repeated negative feedback appears to induce individuals to see each successive failure as more and more diagnostic. As a result, even a short series of failed attempts evokes beliefs that future attempts will also fail. These emergent expectations of failure, generated by causal attribution processes, associative learning, and/or discounting of ambiguous information, appear very compelling and induce people to forgo profitable marginal investments. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Attribution · Context (archaeology · Discounting · Economics · Microeconomics · Sunk costs · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Finance

  • The development of escalation bias across the life span

    Open Access•Jessica Y Y Kwong, Kin Fai Ellick Wong•Cognitive Development•2025

  • Competitive escalation and interventions

    Open Access•Sebastian Hafenbrädl, Jan K Woike•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2018

  • An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion

    Open Access•Bernard Weiner•Attributional Theory of…•1986

  • On the Self-Regulation of Behavior

    Open Access•Charles S Carver, Michael F Scheier•On the Self-Regulation of Behavior•1998

  • Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology

    Open Access•Eliot R Smith, Jamie Decoster•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even

    Open Access•Richard H Thaler, E Johnson et al.•Management Science•1990

  • Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective.

    Baruch Fischhoff, Ruth Beyth-Marom et al.•Psychological Review•1983

  • The psychology of sunk cost

    Open Access•Hal R Arkes, Catherine Blumer•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1985

  • Recent developments in modeling preferences

    Open Access•Colin Camerer, Colin F Camerer et al.•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1992

  • The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments

    Open Access•Maya Bar-Hillel, Maya Bar‐Hillel•Acta Psychologica•1980

  • Between Hope and Fear

    Lola L Lopes•Advances in Experimental Social…•1987

  • Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms

    Daniel Ellsberg•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1961

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Science•1981

  • Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts

    Open Access•Joel Brockner, Jeffrey Z Rubin•Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts•1985

  • Ducking the collection of costly evidence

    Open Access•Rasyid Bo Sanitioso, Rasyid Sanitioso et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1991

  • The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk cost effect

    Open Access•Hal R Arkes, Laura Hutzel•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2000

  • Ambiguity and rationality

    Open Access•Deborah Frisch, Jonathan Baron•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1988

  • The discounting of ambiguous information in economic decision making

    Open Access•Eric Van Dijk, Marcel Zeelenberg•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2003

  • Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict

    Open Access•Joel Brockner, Myril C Shaw et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1979

  • Outcome bias in decision evaluation

    Jonathan Baron, John C Hershey•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • The illusion of control

    Ellen J Langer•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

  • The empirical case for two systems of reasoning

    Steven A Sloman•Psychological Bulletin•1996

  • Belief in the law of small numbers

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Bulletin•1971

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae