Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unpacking Divorce

Feature-Based Machine Learning Interpretation of Sociological Patterns

Bibliographic Data

ID12171371
AuthorsHüseyin Doğan (0000-0002-0375-8437, Department of Social Work, Patnos Social Work College, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri, Turkey, corresponding author), Emre Kılınç (0000-0002-5250-9322, Department of Computer Technologies, Patnos Vocational High School, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri, Turkey)
Year2025
Publication date2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science Computer Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-4393 • E-ISSN: 1552-8286
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/08944393251386073
OpenAlexW4414699090
LanguageEN
References cited39

This study introduces a machine learning-based framework aimed at identifying and interpreting the most influential factors contributing to divorce. Utilizing data from the 2021 Turkey Family Structure Survey, we apply Random Forest and Logistic Regression models to rank predictors based on their relative impact on marital dissolution. The goal is to uncover which socio-legal, temporal, and behavioral variables most significantly contribute to the divorce outcome within a culturally grounded dataset. Both models converge on a set of dominant features—psychological conflict responses, cultural marital rituals, and political disagreements—demonstrating their robust influence across different algorithmic paradigms. Feature importance scores derived from model outputs and explainability tools (e.g., permutation and coefficient-based rankings) reveal consistent patterns and offer interpretable insights aligned with sociological theory. This approach contributes to computational sociology by showcasing how machine learning can be used not only for prediction, but more importantly, for identifying statistical patterns that reflect social structures and behavioral dynamics associated with divorce outcomes

Feature (linguistics · Interpretation (philosophy · Logistic regression · Marital status · Outcome (game theory · Random forest · Rank (graph theory · Set (abstract data type · Unpacking · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Family Dynamics and Relationships

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies

    Open Access•Samantha Joel, Paul W Eastwick et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

  • Empirical research on the correlation between rural divorce rates and male marriage costs

    Open Access•Junji Li, Chengcheng Wang•Journal of Sociology and Ethnology•2023

  • Mothers, Fathers, and Student Loans

    Open Access•Alexa Balmuth, Julie Miller et al.•Journal of Family and Economic…•2021

  • Political Difference in Marriage

    Open Access•Jayne R Goode, Kendra Knight et al.•Communication Studies•2021

  • Marriage, Divorce, and Children's Adjustment

    Robert E Emery, Robert Emery•Marriage, Divorce, and Children's…•1999

  • Demand‐withdraw patterns in marital conflict in the home

    Open Access•Lauren M Papp, Chrystyna D Kouros et al.•Personal Relationships•2009

  • Cohabiting couple's economic organization and marriage patterns across social classes

    Open Access•K Mcerlean•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2024

  • Assessing the deinstitutionalization of marriage thesis

    Open Access•Sassler, Amanda J Miller•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2023

  • The power of family

    Open Access•Hao Li•Chinese Journal of Sociology•2022

  • Do Income and Employment Uncertainty Affect Couple Stability? Evidence for France During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Anna Barbuscia, Ariane Pailhé et al.•European Journal of Population /…•2023

  • What Tears Couples Apart

    Open Access•Bruno Arpino, Marco Le Moglie et al.•Demography•2022

  • Sleeping With the Enemy

    Open Access•Bruno Arpino, Alessandro Di Nallo•Demography•2025

  • Prediction of the End of a Romantic Relationship in Peruvian Youth and Adults

    José Ventura-León, Cristopher Lino‐cruz et al.•The Journal of General Psychology•2024

  • Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000

    M Kalmijn•Population Studies•2007

  • Understanding Divorce Trends and Risks

    Open Access•Rune Zahl-Olsen•Journal of Family History•2023

  • Re-theorizing Family Demographics

    Open Access•G Esping-Andersen, Gosta Esping‐andersen et al.•Population and Development Review•2015

  • The Ex-Factor

    Open Access•Sirus H Dehdari, Karl-Oskar Lindgren et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Marriage, cohabitation, and institutional context

    Open Access•C L W Yang•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2025

  • Degrees of Change

    Open Access•Andrew J Cherlin•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2020

  • Research on Divorce

    Open Access•Paul R Amato•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae