Free Trade
A Dead End for Underdeveloped Economies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12229803 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rune Skarstein (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 347-367 |
| Publication date | 2007-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Political Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8259 • E-ISSN: 1465-3982 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09538250701453022 |
| OpenAlex | W2172279095 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 30 |
Critics of the free trade doctrine tend to argue that the theory of comparative advantage is not wrong in itself, but that its assumptions are not generally fulfilled in the real world, and hence that free trade is desirable under ‘ideal conditions.’ By contrast, this paper argues that the theory of comparative advantage does not hold even under ‘ideal conditions.’ The theory, a variation on the story of static efficiency, pays no attention to dynamic considerations, such as long-term technical change and productivity growth, which are essential in economic development. Starting from the ‘growth laws’ of Verdoorn and Kaldor, this paper argues that dynamic efficiency is intimately related to industrial growth. Moreover, because industrial goods have higher income elasticity of demand than agricultural goods, there is a positive feedback mechanism from international and domestic demand for industrial goods to the Verdoorn-Kaldor ‘laws’ of productivity growth. The empirical evidence indicates that poor countries do not have a comparative advantage in agricultural goods, and that they have an absolute disadvantage in the trade of agricultural as well as industrial goods. Further liberalisation of trade in agricultural goods will therefore harm rather than help the poorest countries. To achieve economic development, those countries need the freedom to implement a strategy designed for that purpose, just as the now-industrialised countries did
Comparative advantage · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Free trade · Harm · International economics · International trade · Macroeconomics · Productivity · Economic Growth and Productivity · Economic Theory and Policy · Global trade and economics · Law
Right-leaning egalitarians are just as susceptible to social justice-induced product patronage! Evidence from the US and Malaysia
How Is Economic Growth Impacted by the Neighbours and the Past? Can Tourism Be an Alternative Engine of Economic Growth
Neopatrimonialism and the Political Economy of Economic Performance in Africa
David Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage and Developing Countries
The general theory of employment, interest, and money
On the principles of political economy, and taxation.
Strategic factors in economic development.
Governing the Market
The General Theory of Employment
Trade Policy and Economic Growth
Dynamic forces in capitalist development
Asia's Next Giant
On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation
Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
A Short Economic History of Modern Japan
What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’
Reassessing the Theory of Comparative Advantage
The Least Developed Countries Report 2004
Rethinking International Trade
Productivity Growth and Economic Performance
Tariffs and Growth in the Late 19th Century
Rethinking International Trade
Governing the Market
The Economic Development of the Third World since 1900
The Imperialism of Free Trade
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |