Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Voices of young biosphere stewards on the strengths, weaknesses, and ways forward for 74 Unesco Biosphere Reserves across 83 countries

Bibliographic Data

ID12262002
AuthorsAlicia Donnellan Barraclough (0000-0003-4433-2923, University of Bergen, corresponding author), L Schultz (0000-0003-4763-8872, Stockholm Resilience Centre), Inger Elisabeth Måren, Inger Måren (0000-0002-3964-9144, University of Bergen)
Year2021
Volume68
Pages102273-102273
Publication date2021-04-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Environmental Change (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-3780 • E-ISSN: 1872-9495
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102273
OpenAlexW3156336748
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited55

Young stakeholders are key actors in social-ecological systems, who have the capacity to be agents of sustainability transformation but are also at high risk of exclusion in the unfolding of global change challenges. Despite the focus of sustainability on future generations, there has been little research effort aimed at understanding young actors’ roles as biosphere stewards. In this work we investigate how young stakeholders perceive and participate in the implementation of sustainability objectives in 74 Biosphere Reserves of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO) the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme across 83 countries, through participatory group workshops, individual surveys and grey literature review. We explore to what extent youth perceptions are aligned or not with current understandings of Biosphere Reserves and how young stakeholders are acting in pursuit of Biosphere Reserve objectives. We find that young stakeholders have a comprehensive understanding of the opportunities and challenges faced by environmental governance, such as resilience and adaptation to global change and the governance challenges of implementing adaptive co-management and increasing stakeholder participation. We also show that young stakeholders can be active participants in a wide range of activities that contribute to achieving conservation and development goals in their territories. They are particularly concerned with youth participation within all levels of Biosphere Reserve functioning and with the creation of sustainable livelihood opportunities that will allow future generations to remain in their native territories. Our study provides evidence of the importance of young stakeholder knowledge and perspectives as central actors in conservation and development initiatives, like Biosphere Reserves, and of the need to increase young stakeholder integration and participation within environmental governance

Biology · Biosphere · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Strengths and weaknesses · Coastal and Marine Management · Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Psychology · Ecology

  • Participatory mapping of the forest community stakeholders in Europe focusing on forest genetic resources, forest reproductive material, and protected forests

    Open Access•Tadej Rogelja, L Secco et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • Engaging participatory mapping for co-management and spatial depiction of nature’s contributions to people in the Portuguese biosphere reserves

    Open Access•Miguel Moreira, Luciana Frazão et al.•Ecosystems and People•2024

  • Participatory mapping reveals biocultural and nature values in the shared landscape of a Nordic Unesco Biosphere Reserve

    Open Access•Jarrod Cusens, Alicia M D Barraclough et al.•People and Nature•2022

  • Global knowledge–action networks at the frontlines of sustainability

    Open Access•Alicia Donnellan Barraclough, Maureen G Reed et al.•People and Nature•2023

  • Unlocking the potential of biosphere reserves

    Open Access•Camilla Sandström, Irina Mancheva et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2025

  • Biosphere Reserves as model regions for transdisciplinarity? A literature review

    Open Access•Caroline Hélène Dabard, Charlotte Gohr et al.•Sustainability Science•2024

  • Plural values of nature help to understand contested pathways to sustainability

    Open Access•Adrian Martins, Erik Gomez‐baggethun et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Empowering young people with climate and ocean science

    Open Access•Rachel Kelly, Laura G Elsler et al.•One Earth•2022

  • Becoming a Developed and Sustainable Destination

    Open Access•María Isabel Sánchez Hernández, Juan José Maldonado Briegas•Heritage•2023

  • Participatory governance for people and nature in multifunctional landscapes — insights from Biosphere Reserves

    Open Access•Hanna Sinare, Kaera Coetzer et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2025

  • Leveraging place-based identities and senses of belonging to mobilize for action-oriented research in Unesco sites

    Open Access•Katja Malmborg, Jacqueline M Hamilton et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2025

  • Co-creating cultural narratives for sustainable rural development

    Open Access•Iris Bohnet, Rosalind Bryce et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2025

  • Listening to Experiences of Environmental Change in Rural Vietnam

    Open Access•Leila Beckwith, Siobhan Warrington et al.•Progress in Development Studies•2023

  • Socio-cultural values and biophysical supply

    Open Access•Jarrod Cusens, Alicia Donnellan Barraclough et al.•Land Use Policy•2024

  • Enhancing the transformative potential of sustainability innovations

    Open Access•Caroline Hélène Dabard, Carsten Mann et al.•AMBIO•2025

  • Integration matters

    Open Access•Jarrod Cusens, Alicia Donnellan Barraclough et al.•AMBIO•2023

  • Finding Your Tribe! Participatory Evaluation of Co-Creation With Children and Young People in Support of Environmental Action

    Open Access•Aoife Deane, Katie Reid et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Parks and Peoples

    Paige West, Jim Igoe et al.•Annual Review of Anthropology•2006

  • Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research

    Pat Bazeley, Patricia Bazeley•Integrating Analyses in Mixed…•2018

  • Principles for Building Resilience

    Open Access•Reinette Biggs, Maja Schlüter et al.•Principles for Building Resilience•2015

  • Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2006

  • Knowing But Not Doing

    Open Access•A T Knight, Richard M Cowling et al.•Conservation Biology•2008

  • Youth Mobilization to Stop Global Climate Change

    Open Access•Heejin Han, Sang Wuk Ahn•Sustainability•2020

  • Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales

    Open Access•Eleanor J Sterling, Christopher E Filardi et al.•Nature Ecology & Evolution•2017

  • Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research

    Open Access•Johan Enqvist, Johan Peçanha Enqvist et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2018

  • Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett•Conservation Biology•2016

  • Responding to the Impacts of the Climate Crisis on Children and Youth

    Open Access•Ann Sanson, Judith Van Hoorn et al.•Child Development Perspectives•2019

  • Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital

    Open Access•L Schultz, Carl Folke et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Reinette Biggs, Maja Schlüter et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2012

  • Environmental Stewardship

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett, Tara Sayuri Whitty et al.•Environmental Management•2018

  • Whose conservation?

    Open Access•Georgina M Mace•Science•2014

  • Qualitative Data Analysis in Health Psychology

    Toby Ro Newton-John, Toby Newton‐john•Qualitative Data Analysis in…•2018

  • Understanding Institutional Diversity

    Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL…•2006

  • The implementation of the conceptual shift in conservation

    Open Access•Klara J Winkler•Ecosystems and People•2019

  • Learning From 'Actually Existing' Redd

    Open Access•Wolfram H Dressler, Wolfram Dressler et al.•Conservation and Society•2019

  • The case for methodological pluralism

    Open Access•Richard B Norgaard•Ecological Economics•1989

  • Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Jeff Sachs, Guido Schmidt‐Traub et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Stewardship, care and relational values

    Open Access•West, L Jamila Haider et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • The Man and Biosphere programme of Unesco

    Open Access•Peter Bridgewater•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2015

  • The contributions of Unesco Man and Biosphere Programme and biosphere reserves to the practice of sustainability science

    Open Access•Maureen G Reed•Sustainability Science•2018

  • Reporting progress on internationally designated sites

    Open Access•Martin F Price, Jung Jin Park et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2010

  • Learning to live with social-ecological complexity

    Open Access•L Schultz, West et al.•Global Environmental Change•2018

  • Youth is not a political position”

    Open Access•Harriet Thew, Lucie Middlemi et al.•Global Environmental Change•2020

  • Is Adaptive Co-management Delivering? Examining Relationships Between Collaboration, Learning and Outcomes in Unesco Biosphere Reserves

    Open Access•Ryan Plummer, Julia Baird et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Participation, Adaptive Co-management, and Management Performance in the World Network of Biosphere Reserves

    Open Access•L Schultz, Andreas Duit et al.•World Development•2010

  • Assessing governance of biosphere reserves in Central Europe

    Open Access•Rainer Schliep, Susanne Stoll-Kleemann•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance

    Open Access•Maria Tengö, E S Brondizio et al.•AMBIO•2014

  • Tracing the sources of legitimacy

    Open Access•Simon Birnbaum, Örjan Bodin et al.•Policy Sciences•2015

  • Political Ecology

    W Wolford•Annals of the Association of…•2005

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • Age representation in parliaments

    Open Access•Daniel Stockemer, Aksel Sundström•European Political Science Review•2018

  • Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Youths’ Relative Absence in Legislatures

    Open Access•Aksel Sundström, Daniel Stockemer•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • Middle-range theories of land system change

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt, Rinku Roy Chowdhury et al.•Global Environmental Change•2018

  • The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Graeme S Cummings•Anthropocene•2016

  • What is Social Learning

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Mark S Reed et al.•Conservation Ecology•2010

  • Scale Mismatches in Social-Ecological Systems

    Open Access•Graeme S Cummings, David H M Cummings et al.•Conservation Ecology•2006

  • Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems

    Open Access•R Preiser, Reinette Biggs et al.•Conservation Ecology•2018

Unique citing works17
Citations per year4,25
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae