Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Smart and social? Assessing social value in the EU Leader programme in rural Estonia

Bibliographic Data

ID12317455
AuthorsLiisa Asso (0009-0006-8428-7003, University of Tartu, Estonia, corresponding author), Kadri Kangro (0000-0002-2582-7034, Tallinn University, Estonia)
Year2025
Publication date2025-10-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Urban and Regional Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0969-7764 • E-ISSN: 1461-7145
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/09697764251379240
OpenAlexW4415604164
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited44

This study explores how the LEADER programme in rural Estonia aligns with the concept of smart rurality by leveraging technology, innovation, and collaborative governance to address rural development challenges. Specifically, it investigates the social value created through grassroots approaches, focusing on how Local Action Groups (LAGs) foster social cohesion, trust, and regional resilience. Using a qualitative methodology, 26 semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with representatives of LAGs, local government officials, and entrepreneurs across Estonia. The findings reveal that the LEADER programme empowers stakeholders by aligning development initiatives with local needs, fostering social cohesion, and building trust within communities. Estonia’s LAGs have successfully reduced bureaucracy, enhanced cross-sector collaboration, and ensured efficient resource use. However, challenges such as favouritism and a lack of transparency persist, reflecting broader critiques of the programme across Europe. By framing these findings within the concept of smart rurality, the study demonstrates how collaborative governance and social innovation contribute to rural resilience. Estonia’s experience highlights the potential of regionally tailored solutions to balance social, economic, and environmental priorities. The study concludes by advocating for further research using mixed methods to engage diverse stakeholders, improve the evaluation of social value, and advance inclusive and sustainable rural development. In addition, recommendations for advancing rural development practices are provided, emphasizing strategies to enhance inclusivity, transparency, and alignment with sustainability goals

Collaborative governance · Collective action · Corporate governance · Focus group · Framing (construction · Grassroots · Resource mobilization · Rurality · Sustainability · Transparency (behavior · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Regional Development and Policy · Rural development and sustainability

  • Smart rurality and regional inequalities

    Open Access•Bianka Plüschke-Altof, Bradley Loewen et al.•European Urban and Regional Studies•2026

  • “What is a smart solution supposed to mean anyway?” Quiet smartness and the recognition of rural smart development as a question of knowledge production

    Open Access•Bianka Plüschke-Altof, Bradley Loewen et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • The Well-Connected Community

    Alison Gilchrist•The Well-Connected Community•2019

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•1990

  • Public Governance as Co-creation

    Open Access•Christopher Ansell, Jacob Torfing•Public Governance As Co-Creation•2021

  • Critical service logic

    Open Access•Christian Grönroos, Päivi Voima•Journal of the Academy of…•2013

  • Local governance in rural Portugal

    Madalena Corte-Real, Elizete Jardim et al.•European Planning Studies•2026

  • Smart villages concept — A bibliometric analysis and state-of-the-art literature review

    Open Access•Katarzyna Bokun, Joanicjusz Nazarko•Progress in Planning•2023

  • The Smart City journey

    Carmen Echebarria, Jose M Barrutia et al.•Innovation The European Journal…•2021

  • The Leader programme 2007–2013

    Open Access•Thomas Dax, Wibke Strahl et al.•European Urban and Regional Studies•2013

  • What are shared and social values of ecosystems

    Open Access•Jasper O Kenter, Liz O’brien et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Leader and rural development policy - What's the problem represented to be

    Open Access•Jörgen Johansson, Mats Holmquist•Journal of Rural Studies•2024

  • Social Capital in the Leader Initiative

    Open Access•Gianluca Nardone, Roberta Sisto et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2009

  • Evaluating the social added value of Leader

    Open Access•Georgios Chatzichristos, Anastasios Perimenis•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • Are remote rural areas in Europe remarkable? Challenges and opportunities

    Open Access•Perpiña Castillo Carolina, Carolina Perpiña Castillo et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2023

  • Rural geography I

    Open Access•John Mcdonagh•Progress in Human Geography•2013

  • Social value creation through tourism enterprise

    Open Access•Levent Altinay, Levent Altınay et al.•Tourism Management•2016

  • Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation

    Open Access•Jacob Torfing, Eva Sørensen et al.•Administration & Society•2019

  • Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation

    Open Access•Frank Moulaert, Flavia Martinelli et al.•Urban Studies•2005

  • The Leader Initiative has been a Victim of Its Own Success. The Decline of the Bottom‐Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia

    Open Access•Francisco Antonio Navarro Valverde, Francisco Antonio Navarro et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2015

  • Territorial Administration and Political Control

    Open Access•Jean-Claude Thoenig•Public Administration•2005

  • Collaborative Innovation

    Open Access•Jean Hartley, Eva Sørensen et al.•Public Administration Review•2013

  • A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value

    Jacob Torfing, Ewan Ferlie et al.•Policy & Politics•2021

  • An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance

    Kirk Emerson, Tina Nabatchi et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection

    Open Access•B B Bock•Sociologia Ruralis•2016

  • Is Leader Elitist or Inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG Boards in the 2007â2013 Rural Development and Fisheries Programmes

    Open Access•Annette Aagaard Thuesen•Sociologia Ruralis•2010

  • The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Nancy Aaron Jones, Natalie A Jones et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

  • Empowering Local Action through Neo-Endogenous Development; The Case of Leader in England

    Open Access•Gary Bosworth, Ivan Annibal et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2016

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae