Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Trap of Neo-patrimonialism

Social Accountability and Good Governance in Cambodia

Bibliographic Data

ID12349608
AuthorsDanilo Vuković (0000-0001-5209-1344, University of Belgrade, corresponding author), Marija Babović (University of Belgrade, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume42
Issue1
Pages144-160
Publication date2018-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Studies Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1035-7823 • E-ISSN: 1467-8403
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10357823.2017.1414773
OpenAlexW2791699085
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited33

In this article, we analyse the social accountability (SA) mechanisms that have recently been established in Cambodia. These initiatives take place in a socio-political context marked by pervasive neo-patrimonial structures. Our focus is on the “strategies” implemented by state actors, CSOs and ordinary citizens (mediated by neo-patrimonial structures) – strategies that demonstrate a “neo-patrimonial trap” into which SA initiatives have fallen, whereby official institutions and accountability lines have been undermined. These “strategies” are: to focus SA activities on local level authorities who have no means or power to introduce changes in governance or to improve public services, and to allow SA practices to emerge only to the extent that they do not threaten actual authoritarian distribution of power, norms and practices of clientelistic exchange, and the benefits obtained through patron-client relations. As a result, citizens have not been empowered to demand accountability but, paradoxically, have been encouraged to take over some government responsibilities. This, in turn, strengthens the networks of clientelism and patronage. These insights indicate the weak potential of externally-imposed SA mechanisms in an authoritarian and neo-patrimonial setting in which the government is only partly committed to achieving accountability. The findings are based on a two-year study conducted using a combination of qualitative sociological methods and an ethnographic approach

Accountability · Asian studies · China · Corporate governance · Economics · Geography · Management · Political science · Sociology · Trap (plumbing · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Cambodian History and Society · Law · Public Administration · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

  • Supporting stakeholders to anticipate and respond to risks in a Mekong River water-energy-food nexus

    Open Access•Louise Gallagher, B Kopainsky et al.•Conservation Ecology•2020

  • Informal accountability. Street-level bureaucrats’ tactics to defy bad reputation in agencies of the Argentinian justice system

    Ingo Rohrer•Oxford Development Studies•2020

  • Parallel normative reality

    Open Access•Danilo Vuković, Bojan Spaić•Sociologija•2022

  • Clientelism in Cambodian residential care institutions

    Rebecca Nhep•Children s Geographies•2024

  • The Quest for Government Accountability and Rule of Law

    Open Access•Danilo Vuković•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2018

  • Unrooted responses

    Open Access•Hollie Grant, Philippe Le Billon•Environment and Planning C…•2020

  • Accountability Politics

    Jonathan A Fox•Accountability Politics•2007

  • The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization

    James Manor•The political economy of…•1999

  • Widgets or Watchdogs?

    Anuradha Joshi, Peter P Houtzager•Public Management Review•2012

  • The demise of clientelism in affluent capitalist democracies

    Open Access•Herbert Kitschelt•Patrons, Clients and Policies•2007

  • The role of civil society in fostering government accountability in contemporary Serbia

    Open Access•Danilo Vuković•Sociologija•2015

  • The Political Economy of the Cambodian Transition

    Caroline Hughes•Political Economy of the…•2003

  • Violent Neoliberalism

    Open Access•Simon Springer•Violent Neoliberalism•2015

  • Cambodia's Neoliberal Order

    Simon Springer•Cambodia's Neoliberal Order•2010

  • Reinventing Accountability

    Open Access•Anne Marie Goetz, A Goetz et al.•Reinventing Accountability•2005

  • The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives

    Open Access•J Gaventa, Rosemary Mcgee•Development Policy Review•2013

  • Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa

    Open Access•Michael Bratton, Nicolas Van De Walle•World Politics•1994

  • The privatization of public interest

    Sangeeta Kamat•Review of International Political…•2004

  • From shouting to counting

    Open Access•David J Norman•The Pacific Review•2014

  • Social Accountability

    Open Access•Jonathan Fox, Jonathan A Fox•World Development•2015

  • Civil Society and Good Governance

    Open Access•Indrajit Roy•World Development•2008

  • International Democracy Assistance for Peacebuilding

    Sophal Ear•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2008

  • Beyond Democracy in Cambodia

    Joakim Öjendal, M Lilja•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2011

  • The Myth of Civil Society

    Open Access•Bruce P Chadwick•Political Science Quarterly•2004

  • External actors and the relative autonomy of the ruling elite in post-Untac Cambodia

    Open Access•Andrew Robert Cock, ANDREW COCK•Journal of Southeast Asian Studies•2010

  • Korob, Kaud, Klach

    Open Access•Joakim Öjendal, Kim Sedara et al.•Journal of Southeast Asian Studies•2006

  • Limited state and strong social forces

    Open Access•Say Sok•Journal of Southeast Asian Studies•2014

  • Doing NGO Work

    Tim Frewer•Australian Geographer•2013

  • Two Concepts of Accountability

    Mark Bovens•West European Politics•2010

  • The Quality of Democracy

    Open Access•Guillermo O’donnell•Journal of democracy•2004

  • Ideological Coalitions and the International Promotion of Social Accountability

    Open Access•Gary Rodan, Garry Rodan et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Violent Neoliberalism

    Simon Springer, Anne Hennings•Journal of Social Issues in…•2018

  • Co-Governance for Accountability

    Open Access•John Ackerman•World Development•2004

  • Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia

    Open Access•James C Scott•American Political Science Review•1972

  • State, Society and Democratic Consolidation

    Kheang Un•Pacific Affairs•2006

  • Land Rights in Cambodia

    Kheang Un, Sokbunthoeun So•Pacific Affairs•2011

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,75
Citation span2018 - 2024 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae