A visual guide for the Brabant index to score dental macrowear quantity and direction

Bibliographic Data

ID12371167
AuthorsJudyta Olszewski (0000-0002-2417-6196, Division of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa), Jason Hemingway (0000-0001-8199-5799, The Human Variation and Identification Research Unit (HVIRU), School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa), V E Gibbons (0000-0001-7875-3297, Division of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume34
Issue6
Publication date2024-09-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Osteoarchaeology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1047-482X • E-ISSN: 1099-1212
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/oa.3349
OpenAlexW4402430006
LanguageEN
References cited50

This study aimed to reduce subjectivity bias in scoring dental macrowear quantity and direction using the Brabant index, which previously relied solely on written descriptions. To achieve this, we present a new, optimized visual guide incorporating buccal and lingual scores. The optimization process involved conceptualizing and illustrating a visual guide using Holocene southern African hunter‐gatherer and herder teeth, featuring both buccal and lingual scores for multicuspid teeth. The guide was hand‐drawn using a stippling technique and digitized to depict surface details for each wear stage and tooth type. We conducted intra‐ and inter‐observer assessments to evaluate the optimized method using both the original and optimized Brabant indices. Statistical analysis was performed in R using Cohen's kappa for direction and Cohen's weighted kappa for quantity. Intra‐observer results for the original method yielded kappa values of 0.84 for direction and 0.94 for quantity, while the optimized version both resulted in improved values of 0.99. Inter‐observer results revealed some differences between an inexperienced and an experienced observer. The inexperienced observer achieved kappa scores of 0.20 for direction and 0.86 for quantity with the original method, and 0.17 and 0.80, respectively, with the optimized version. The experienced observer's results using the original index were 0.66 for direction and 0.89 for quantity, and 0.75 and 0.96, respectively, with the optimized version. These findings demonstrate that the optimized method enhances data reliability for experienced observers, highlighting the value of a published visual guide and multicuspid scoring adjustments. However, reduced or unappreciable changes in accuracies for the inexperienced observer illustrate the need for dental expertise when scoring for dental wear, even with a modified method

Archaeology · Geography · Index (typography · Computer Science · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dentistry · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Medicine · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Geology