Social inequality and body mass differences in two post‐Medieval Dutch populations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12371395 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yuran Niu (0009-0005-6313-0704, Bioarchaeology Laboratory Jilin University Changchun China, corresponding author), Sarah A Schrader (0000-0003-0424-6748, Laboratory for Human Osteoarchaeology, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden University the Netherlands) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Osteoarchaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1047-482X • E-ISSN: 1099-1212 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/oa.3320 |
| OpenAlex | W4399506675 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 33 |
Adult body mass is largely related to nutrition levels, which can be affected by external stressors, such as diet, environment, and disease. High‐status and low‐status groups likely had very different nutrition and stress experiences, which might result in differences in population's body mass. Since inequality between social statuses prevailed in Europe in the post‐Medieval period, did these differences result in body mass variations between high‐status and low‐status populations in the Netherlands? In order to answer this question, this research compared body size of two post‐Medieval urban skeletal collections with different social statuses from the Eusebius cemetery of two cemeteries of the 17th–19th centuries: the Arnhem and the Broerenkerk church of Zwolle, the Netherlands. Social statuses of the two collections are estimated based on the burial locations, grave goods, and historical records. Body mass was estimated using both femoral head diameter method and stature/bi‐iliac breadth method. Results have shown no statistically significant differences in body mass between the two samples. Therefore, this research suggests that inequality in post‐Medieval Dutch society did not result in observable population body mass differences in the skeletal collections of different social status groups. It cannot, however, prove that social inequality in populations did not impact body size or health more broadly
Ancient history · Demographic economics · Economics · Geography · Inequality · Middle Ages · Social inequality · Sociology · Demography · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Mathematics
The First Modern Economy
Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton
Poverty and obesity
Mortuary practices, society and ideology
Adult height, nutrition, and population health
Evolution, development and timing of puberty
Beyond BMI
Energy Balance and Obesity
A systematic review of psychosocial explanations for the relationship between socioeconomic status and body mass index
Weight stigma and eating behavior
Diet and Dental Caries in Post-Medieval London
The Osteological Paradox 20 Years Later
The urban sanitary movement in England and Germany, 1838–1914
Wider income gaps, wider waistbands? An ecological study of obesity and income inequality
Socioeconomic inequalities in death from past to present
Almshouses in England and the Dutch Republic circa 1350-1800
Stature and body mass estimation from skeletal remains in the European Holocene
Articular and diaphyseal remodeling of the proximal femur with changes in body mass in adults
Human body mass estimation
Social “status” and biological “status”
Estimation of stature in archaeological human skeletal remains from Britain
Morphological adaptation to climate in modern and fossil hominids
The Osteological Paradox
The effect of age and body composition on body mass estimation of males using the stature/bi-iliac method
Can we refine body mass estimations based on femoral head breadth
Urbanization and respiratory stress in the Northern Low Countries
Differential infant and child mortality in three Dutch regions, 1812-19091
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |