Bystander intervention in bullying based on sexual orientation and gender identity and expression among cisgender and heterosexual students
A cross‐linguistic European study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12388571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Salvatore Ioverno (0000-0001-9970-9666, Department of Education Roma Tre University Rome Italy), Sara Costa (0000-0002-4294-6641, Department of Education Roma Tre University Rome Italy, corresponding author), Giulia Graziano (0009-0000-4450-5789, Department of Education Roma Tre University Rome Italy), Michela Mariotto (0000-0002-0500-468X, Department of Education Roma Tre University Rome Italy) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Research on Adolescence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1050-8392 • E-ISSN: 1532-7795 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jora.70050 |
| OpenAlex | W4412042470 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
Bullying based on sexual orientation and gender identity and expression (SOGIE) is a pervasive issue affecting sexual and gender minority (SGM) students and has profound adverse effects on mental health and academic performance. Promoting bystander interventions, where peers step in to stop SOGIE‐based bullying, may be a promising strategy to reduce such discriminatory behaviors. Yet, reliable cross‐linguistic measures tailored specifically to SOGIE‐based bullying are lacking. This study validated a scale assessing cis ‐gender and heterosexual students' bystander intentions to intervene in SOGIE‐based bullying across eight languages. A second‐order confirmatory factor analysis supported a three‐factor model: “Responsibility” (recognizing one's duty to intervene), “Know” (having the skills and knowledge to intervene), and “Act” (taking prompt action to stop SOGIE‐based bullying). The scale demonstrated consistent configural and metric invariance across languages and partial scalar invariance, enabling, however, cross‐linguistic comparisons. Significant linguistic differences in bystander attitude emerged, with Portuguese and Spanish speakers reporting significant higher levels than Dutch, Slovenian, and English speakers. Responsibility accounted for the most cross‐country variation, reflecting differences in perceptions of duty, efficacy, and communication norms regarding SOGIE‐based bullying. This validated tool offers a valuable resource for cross‐cultural research and educational efforts, with future studies needed to explore cultural dynamics further and extend validation to SGM students
Bystander effect · Developmental psychology · Expression (computer science · Gender identity · Homosexuality · Human sexuality · Identity (music · Intervention (counseling · Orientation (vector space · Sexual identity · Sexual orientation · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Clinical Psychology · Gender Studies · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Psychology · Social Psychology · Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment
Bullying and the peer group
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Sexual minority youth’s mental health and substance use
Stay away or stay together? Social contagion, common identity, and bystanders’ interventions in homophobic bullying episodes
What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition
Factors predicting student intervention when witnessing anti-LGBTQ harassment
Imagined and extended contact experiences and adolescent bystanders' behavioral intentions in homophobic bullying episodes
Bullying as a group process
Comprehensive Sexuality Education as a Longitudinal Predictor of LGBTQ Name-Calling and Perceived Willingness to Intervene in School
Bullying at School - What We Know and What We Can Do
Adolescent Health and Harassment Based on Discriminatory Bias
Pisa 2018 Results (Volume III)
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Participant Roles in Bullying
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |