Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dogs in Dutch Media

Exploring Public Opinion As A Step Toward Solving Dog Welfare Problems

Bibliographic Data

ID12419126
AuthorsSusan Ophorst (0000-0001-7674-2324, Radboud University Nijmegen the Netherlands, corresponding author), Noelle Aarts (0000-0001-5134-4004, Radboud University Nijmegen the Netherlands), Bernice Bovenkerk (0000-0002-3955-2430, Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands), Hans Hopster (Wageningen University & Research)
Year2023
Pages1-20
Publication date2023-11-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety and Animals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1063-1119 • E-ISSN: 1568-5306
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15685306-bja10154
OpenAlexW4388783482
LanguageEN
References cited16

Dogs are considered humans’ best friend, but this relationship is not all puppies and sunshine. Zoonoses, biting incidents, hereditary problems, and other welfare issues can threaten the relationship, especially when humans are not aware of them. Public opinion on dogs in the densely populated Netherlands was therefore examined. Dutch newspapers and Facebook were analyzed with frame analysis. A positive view of dogs seems predominant, followed by one that sees dogs as normal, while problems with dogs are less common. That dogs are considered close to humans is exemplified by the found norms that the needs of dogs must be met, that severe penalties must be applied when humans do not respect the welfare of dogs, and that dog keepers and conditions are responsible for problems with dogs. The image of the dog as ordinary may hinder public awareness, despite the norms that emphasize the importance of dog welfare

Animal welfare · Animal-assisted therapy · Biology · Biting · Economics · HUBzero · Newspaper · Pet therapy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public opinion · Veterinary medicine · Welfare · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Law · Media Influence and Health · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Ecology

  • How to use and assess qualitative research methods

    Open Access•Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick et al.•Neurological Research and Practice•2020

  • Why the unskilled are unaware

    Open Access•Joyce Ehrlinger, Kerri L Johnson et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2008

  • The Dunning–Kruger Effect

    David Dunning•Advances in Experimental Social…•2011

  • Self-Control as Value-Based Choice

    Open Access•Elliot T Berkman, Cendri A Hutcherson et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2017

  • Interpretive Research Design

    Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, Dvora Yanow•Interpretive research design•2013

  • Dealing with Ambivalence

    Open Access•Hein Te Velde, Noelle Aarts et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2002

  • Forty-two Thousand and One Dalmatians

    Harold Herzog•Society and Animals•2006

  • Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research

    Open Access•Art Dewulf, Barbara Gray et al.•Human Relations•2009

  • Covering the crisis

    Open Access•Hajo G Boomgaarden, Hajo Boomgaarden et al.•Acta Politica•2011

  • How Media Frames Move Public Opinion

    Open Access•Nayda Terkildsen, Frauke Schnell•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • Evolution and Cognition

    Open Access•Alan C Kamil•Evolution and Human Behavior•2001

  • Moral Convictions and Culling Animals

    Nina E Cohen, Nina Cohen et al.•Anthrozoös•2012

  • Social Networks and Health

    Kirsten P Smith, Nicholas A Christakis•Annual Review of Sociology•2008

  • Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power

    William A Gamson, Andre Modigliani•American Journal of Sociology•1989

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae