Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Selective Engagement of US Naval Power in Maritime Conflicts

The Guardian of Freedom of Navigation

Bibliographic Data

ID12498236
AuthorsJonghwan Han (0000-0002-5785-1768, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume36
Issue3
Pages380-404
Publication date2021-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePacific Focus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1225-4657 • E-ISSN: 1976-5118
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/pafo.12192
OpenAlexW4200552538
LanguageEN
References cited29

Since the Second World War, the United States has deterred conflictual behaviors over maritime claims that can impede the freedom of navigation, because it is essential for maintaining its leading position in the global system. Basically, many US naval warships operating in the sea clearly shows the US intention to maintain status quo and to prevent the occurrence of any types of disruptions in disputed maritime areas. However, it does not necessarily mean that the pacifying effect of US naval power is homogeneous to all maritime claims. When considering the vast area of the sea and the limited number of US naval warships, it is impossible to deploy an equal number of naval warships to all maritime areas. Therefore, the influence of US naval power in maintaining order in the sea is conditional based on the characteristic of maritime claims which can determine the US priority to use its naval power. This research finds that when maritime claims are related to the freedom of navigation, the pacifying effect of US naval power to maintain stability in the sea is increased

Aeronautics · Business · Freedom of navigation · Guardian · International law · Law of the sea · Operations research · Order (exchange · Political science · Position (finance · Power (physics · Status quo · Computer Science · Engineering · International Maritime Law Issues · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Maritime Security and History

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•1990

  • Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model

    Open Access•A Colin Cameron, Pravin K Trivedi•Journal of Econometrics•1990

  • Regions of War and Peace

    Open Access•Douglas Lemke•Regions of War and Peace•2002

  • War and Peace in International Rivalry

    Paul F Diehl, Gary Goertz et al.•War and Peace in International…•2000

  • Offshore oil development and maritime conflict in the 20th century

    Open Access•Elizabeth Nyman•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

  • Cruising for a Bruising

    Jonathan D Caverley, Peter Dombrowski•Security Studies•2020

  • Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992

    Open Access•Daniel M Jones, Stuart A Bremer et al.•Conflict Management and Peace…•1996

  • Rogue states and territorial disputes

    Open Access•Stephen Mark Mitchell, Peter F Trumbore•Conflict Management and Peace…•2013

  • Power at Sea

    Brian Benjamin Crisher, Mark Souva•International Interactions•2014

  • Ruling the Sea

    Stephen Nemeth, Stephen C Nemeth et al.•International Interactions•2014

  • Hegemony and strategic culture

    Open Access•Bradley S Klein•Review of International Studies•1988

  • Command of the Commons

    Barry R Posen•International Security•2003

  • The 1995–96 Taiwan Strait Confrontation

    Robert S Ro, ROBERT S ROSS•International Security•2000

  • Balancing on Land and at Sea

    Jack S Levy, William R Thompson•International Security•2010

  • The Great Powers and Global Struggle, 1490-1990

    Francis Fukuyama, Karen Rasler et al.•Foreign Affairs•1995

  • Navies and Foreign Policy

    Open Access•C I Hamilton•The Historical Journal•1978

  • The Tragedy of Great Power Politics

    John J Mearsheimer•The Tragedy of Great Power Politics•2014

  • Conflict Management in Land, River, and Maritime Claims

    Open Access•Andrew P Owsiak, Stephen Mark Mitchell et al.•Political Science Research and…•2019

  • Shocks to the System

    Open Access•Michael Colaresi•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2001

  • Bones of Contention

    Open Access•Paul R Hensel, Stephen Mark Mitchell et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2008

  • Power Parity, Commitment to Change, and War

    Douglas Lemke, Suzanne Werner•International Studies Quarterly•1996

  • International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements

    Open Access•Stephen Mark Mitchell, Sara Mclaughlin Mitchell et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Clashes at Sea

    Stephen Mark Mitchell, Sara Mclaughlin Mitchell•Security Studies•2020

  • Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986

    Open Access•Zeev Maoz, Bruce Russett•American Political Science Review•1993

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae