The effect of knowledge and ignorance assessments on perceived risk
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12598252 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sandra Buratti (0000-0001-9866-8436, University of Gothenburg, corresponding author), Carl Martin Allwood (0000-0002-9968-6940, University of Gothenburg), Martin Geisler (0000-0002-7422-6382, University of Gothenburg) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 735-748 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Risk Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13669877.2018.1459795 |
| OpenAlex | W2799916146 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 40 |
This study investigated the effects of two different types of subjective knowledge assessments on the level of knowledge assessment and risk perception in five risk domains: health, environment, crime, economy, and transport (Appendix 1). The two types of knowledge assessments were regular knowledge assessments and ignorance assessments, in which the participants were asked to assess their lack of knowledge. Furthermore, the effect of the order in which the subjective knowledge assessments and risk assessments were performed was investigated. Four different experimental conditions were used to explore the effects. In the knowledge first condition, all regular knowledge assessments were performed, followed by all risk assessments. In the alternate condition, the participants alternated between the knowledge assessments and risk assessments. In the risk first condition, the participants performed all risk assessments, followed by all knowledge assessments. Finally, in the ignorance first condition, the participants performed all ignorance assessments, followed by all risk assessments. The ignorance assessments indicated higher subjective knowledge ratings than the regular knowledge assessments in the first three conditions. The order in which the regular knowledge assessments were performed had no effect on the risk assessments. However, the ignorance assessments were associated with the lowest risk assessments of all four conditions. The participants may have associated their difficulty finding examples of ignorance with a lack of risk
Computer security · Ignorance · Knowledge level · Perception · Risk assessment · Risk perception · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Risk and Safety Analysis · Risk Perception and Management
Storm surges
Risk talk—but not if it rocks the boat. perceived social risk acceptability and risk talk engagement in the Netherlands
A micro-place evaluation of the relationship between ‘risky places’ and risk perceptions
Determinants of perceived risk of online travel purchase in the wake of Covid-19
Perceived risk and insurance decision taking for small losses
A comparative analysis of domestic travel intentions and actual travel behaviors in Covid-19
Millennials’ perception of safety and hygiene measures, perceived health risk, satisfaction and behavioural intention at upscale restaurants amid Covid-19 pandemic
Exploring flash flood risk perception using PCA analysis
Ignorance and Uncertainty
Verbal reports as data.
The White (Male) Effect and Risk Perception
Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems
Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits
Optimistic Biases About Personal Risks
The secret life of fluency
A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (Dospert) scale for adult populations
Confirmation Bias
Factors in Risk Perception
Gender, race, and perceived risk
The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions
Three decades of risk research
Liking is not the opposite of disliking
The "Asymmetry" of "Liking" and "Disliking
Ease of retrieval as information
Gender differences in risk taking
Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,14 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |