Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications

Bibliographic Data

ID12611908
AuthorsStijn Conix (0000-0002-1487-0213, KU Leuven, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume73
Pages27-34
Publication date2018-11-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-8486 • E-ISSN: 1879-2499
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.11.002
PMID30429047
OpenAlexW2900066137
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited39

Economics · Epistemology · Legitimacy · Operationalization · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Positive economics · Sociology · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Disciplinary Fields in the Life Sciences

    Open Access•Alessandro Minelli•Philosophies•2020

  • How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about “Natural Kinds”

    Open Access•Ingo Brigandt•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Taxonomy and conservation science

    Open Access•Stijn Conix•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2019

  • Why use generic language in science

    Olivier Lemeire•The British Journal for the…•2024

  • Is Water H2O?

    Open Access•Haṡok Chang•Is Water H2O?•2012

  • Idealization and the Aims of Science

    Angela Potochnik•Idealization and the Aims of…•2017

  • Mechanisms and natural kinds

    Carl F Craver•Philosophical Psychology•2009

  • The meaning of ‘meaning’

    Hilary Putnam•Philosophical Papers•2010

  • Is 'Natural Kind' a Natural Kind Term?

    John Dupré•The Monist•2002

  • The diverse aims of science

    Open Access•Angela Potochnik•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015

  • Pluto and the platypus

    Open Access•Matthew H Slater•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2017

  • Pure science and the problem of progress

    Open Access•Heather Douglas•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • Species

    Open Access•Philip Kitcher•Philosophy of Science•1984

  • On the Concept of Biological Race and Its Applicability to Humans

    Open Access•Massimo Pigliucci, Jonathan Michael Kaplan et al.•Philosophy of Science•2003

  • Deep Conventionalism about Evolutionary Groups

    Open Access•Matthew J Barker, Joel D Velasco et al.•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • Making Populations

    Open Access•Lisa Gannett•Philosophy of Science•2003

  • Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism

    Open Access•Elliott Sober•Philosophy of Science•1980

  • Eliminative Pluralism

    Open Access•Marc Ereshefsky•Philosophy of Science•1992

  • Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science

    Open Access•Kevin C Elliott, Daniel J Mckaughan•Philosophy of Science•2014

  • Scientific Essentialism

    Lenny Clapp•The Philosophical Review•2002

  • Natural Kindness

    Matthew H Slater•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • Population Pluralism and Natural Selection

    Jacob Stegenga•The British Journal for the…•2016

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,57
Citation span2019 - 2024 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae