The Ceeder database of evidence reviews
An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12665305 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ko Konno (0000-0002-5319-9178, Bangor University, corresponding author), Samantha H Cheng (0000-0003-1799-6310), Samantha Cheng (0009-0008-3085-7896, American Museum of Natural History), Jacqualyn Eales (0000-0002-6693-8697, Royal Cornwall Hospital), Geoff K Frampton (0000-0003-2005-0497, University of Southampton), Geoff Frampton, Christian Kohl (0000-0001-6524-8371, Julius Kühn-Institut), Barbara Livoreil (0000-0003-0230-3737), Biljana Macura (0000-0002-4253-1390, Stockholm Environment Institute), Bethan C O’Leary (0000-0001-6595-6634, University of York), Nicola Randall (0000-0002-3023-8488, Harper Adams University), Nicola P Randall, Jessica J Taylor (0000-0002-2080-6437, Carleton University), Paul Woodcock (0000-0002-2178-5447, Joint Nature Conservation Committee), Andrew S Pullin (0000-0001-5299-8042, Bangor University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 114 |
| Pages | 256-262 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.021 |
| PMID | 32922207 |
| OpenAlex | W3083387357 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 32 |
Business · Economics · Evidence-based policy · Evidence-based practice · Grey literature · Incentive · Knowledge management · Management science · MEDLINE · Political science · Reliability (semiconductor · Resource (disambiguation · Service (business · Systematic review · Transparency (behavior · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Medicine · Marketing
Can open access increase LIS research’s policy impact? Using regression analysis and causal inference
Benefits and barriers for researcher-practitioner collaboration on marine and coastal management issues
Incorporating geographic context into coyote and wolf livestock depredation research
Integrating Bottom-up and Top-down Approaches in Tanzania’s Climate Change Adaptation Planning
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods
Roses RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses
Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews
Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
What Is Conservation Science?
A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences
Does research information meet the needs of stakeholders? Exploring evidence selection in the global management of invasive species
The reliability of evidence review methodology in environmental science and conservation
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |