Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does flood risk funding protect the most vulnerable? A case study of England

Bibliographic Data

ID12665683
AuthorsAnna E Goodden (0009-0001-4518-4742, King's College London), Jack J Porter (0000-0002-5442-5544, King's College London), Francesca Pia Vantaggiato (0000-0003-1154-4540, King's College London, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume157
Pages103781-103781
Publication date2024-05-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103781
OpenAlexW4396719688
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited25

Not only has the frequency and severity of flooding increased under climate change, but which communities are at-risk and how those risks are distributed within communities has changed too. This realisation points to an important interplay between exposure (risk) and social vulnerability. Who is vulnerable? Answering this question is far from straightforward as different vulnerability indicators identify different groups across different scales. This paper addresses this issue. Using the empirical case of England, the spatial distribution of flood risk at different administrative scales is analysed in relation to the Environment Agency (EA) allocation of flood funding between 2015 and 2021. We find that Upper-tier Local Authority Districts with higher levels of both flood risk and social vulnerability received more funding in the period considered. Yet, that is not the scale at which flood scheme funding decisions are made. Flood schemes are decided at the local level, but funding data for smaller administrative scales is not available. Different understandings of vulnerability, the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP), and issues around data transparency and availability in flood risk management, need to be urgently addressed

Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Flood myth · Geography · New england · Political science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Drought Analysis

  • Reimagining environmental science & policy

    Open Access•Nicole Klenk, Christopher Cvitanovic et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2026

  • A state-of-the-art approach to assessing relative multi-dimensional vulnerabilities for urban flood resilience in the UK

    Open Access•Arthur C Woods, Vijaya Gupta et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2025

  • Social vulnerability in regional climate adaptation planning in Europe – Conceptions, operationalisations and shared challenges

    Open Access•Mette Juhl Jessen, Christian Fertner et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Vulnerability to flooding

    Sue Tapsell, S M Tapsell et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2002

  • Interpretation and identification of within-unit and cross-sectional variation in panel data models

    Open Access•Jonathan Kropko, Robert Kubinec et al.•PLoS ONE•2020

  • Flood exposure and social vulnerability in the United States

    Open Access•Ellen Tate, Md Asif Rahman et al.•Natural Hazards•2021

  • Social Vulnerability to Climate-Sensitive Hazards in the Southern United States

    Christopher T Emrich, Susan L Cutter•Weather, Climate, and Society•2011

  • Social and environmental vulnerability to flooding

    Open Access•Selena Hinojos, Lauren McPhillips et al.•Applied Geography•2023

  • Social Resilience to Flooding in Vancouver

    Samantha Hao Yiu Chu, Su‐yin Tan et al.•Environmental Hazards•2020

  • Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental justice

    Open Access•Gordon Walker, Kate Burningham•Critical Social Policy•2011

  • The Vulnerability of Science and the Science of Vulnerability

    Susan L Cutter•Annals of the Association of…•2003

  • Natural and imposed injustices

    Open Access•Clare Johnson, Edmund Penning‐rowsell et al.•Geographical Journal•2007

  • Vulnerability

    Open Access•W Neil Adger•Global Environmental Change•2006

  • Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences

    Gregory, Stanley V Gregory et al.•Geographical Journal•1982

  • Ecological Fallacies and the Analysis of Areal Census Data

    Open Access•Openshaw, Stan Openshaw•Environment and Planning A…•1984

  • Flood-Risk Management, Mapping, and Planning

    Open Access•James Porter, Jack J Porter et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2012

  • It'll never happen to me

    Open Access•Kate Burningham, Jane Fielding et al.•Disasters•2008

  • Environmental Injustice or Just the Lie of the Land

    Open Access•Jane Fielding•Sociological Research Online•2007

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae