Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Keeping Abortion Clinics Open

The Importance of Ragsdale v. Turnock in the Post‐ Casey Era

Bibliographic Data

ID12782884
AuthorsSusan Gluck Mezey (Loyola University Chicago, corresponding author), Raymond Tatalovich (0000-0002-2670-0959, Loyola University Chicago), Michael Walsh (0000-0002-6441-3635)
Year1994
Volume13
Issue1-2
Pages111-126
Publication date1994-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReview of Policy Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-1338.1994.tb00582.x
OpenAlexW2001342204
LanguageEN
References cited12

In 1973, Roe v. Wade constitutionalized a woman's right to an abortion. But, while Roe removed most legal obstacles to abortion, it did not address the limited availability of abortion services in the nation. The case examined here, Ragsdale v. Turnock, revolved around an Illinois statute that imposed far‐reaching restrictions on abortion clinics, the site of most U.S. abortions since Roe. The crucial role of clinics in providing abortion services explains why the dispute represented by Ragsdale had the potential for an enormous impact on legalized abortion in the United States. Because of the number of women affected, the Ragsdale litigation could have led to the most significant judicial ruling since Roe. The suit resulted in a settlement in which plaintiffs secured the right to a legal clinic abortion during the first 18 weeks of pregnancy. Although the case was settled to the satisfaction of pro‐choice advocates, a similar law today might well survive constitutional scrutiny

Abortion · Abortion law · Business · Family planning · Plaintiff · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Research methodology · Scrutiny · Settlement (finance · Sociology · Statute · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Demography · Law · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Abortion Politics

    Helen Rose Fuchs Ebaugh, Helen Rose Ebaugh et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • State Implementation of Supreme Court Decisions

    Susan B Hansen•The Journal of Politics•1980

  • Implementing a Permissive Policy

    Jon R Bond, Charles A Johnson•American Journal of Political…•1982

  • Coercive and Noncoercive Abortion Deterrence Policies

    Open Access•Charles A Johnson, Jon R Bond•Law & Policy•1980

  • The Supreme Court and Social Change

    Open Access•Kathleen A Kemp, Kathleen Kemp et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1978

  • Policy Implementation and Responsiveness in Nongovernmental Institutions

    Charles A Johnson, Jon R Bond•The Western Political Quarterly•1982

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae