Relational leadership, decision-making and the messiness of context in healthcare
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12883284 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Liz Fulop (Griffith University, corresponding author), Annabelle Mark (Middlesex University) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 254-277 |
| Publication date | 2013-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Leadership (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1742-7150 • E-ISSN: 1742-7169 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1742715012468785 |
| OpenAlex | W2128555452 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 63 |
Decision-making is a neglected area in the leadership literature and in healthcare in particular. This paper draws on the Cynefin framework, which is a practice-based approach to decision-making, to theorize about leadership in healthcare. The framework uses a multi-ontology cognitive-based sense-making perspective to identify five domains of decision-making that are linked to individual leadership styles and given contexts. It is markedly different from other complexity approaches by the inclusion of the central domain of Disorder. While this inclusion is vitally important, the leadership implications of the approach are under-theorized. Focusing on the idea of Disorder, we argue alternatively that a relational leadership approach is needed to understand decision-making as a multi-ontology sensemaking approach and this also necessitates accounting for professional sensemaking in healthcare settings. The relational approach adopted here is based on Dian Hosking's work and views decision-making as a task that is undertaken through organizing processes that are cognitive but also social/cultural, political and emotional, and in which the social construction of leadership and context are inseparable individual and collective undertakings. When skilful relating is a part of leadership practice then multi-ontology sensemaking is a possibility in decision-making tasks. We support our arguments with illustrative examples to put forward a relational approach to leadership in healthcare
Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Health care · Knowledge management · Leadership studies · Leadership style · Ontology · Political science · Sensemaking · Shared leadership · Sociology · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Management and Organizational Studies · Organizational Learning and Leadership · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Military Leader–Member’s Relational Identity and its Role in the Transformation of Organizational Silence into Trust Relationships
Leadership During a Pandemic
Leadership as relational practice
Imagine there are no leaders
A death in the family
Making It Work
An innovative leadership development initiative to support building everyday resilience in health systems
Examining clinical leadership in Kenyan public hospitals through the distributed leadership lens
Leadership
Narrative in Social Work
The new dynamics of strategy
Clinical Empathy as Emotional Labor in the Patient-Physician Relationship
Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations
Relationality in Organizational Research
Sensemaking in Organizations
The State of Exception
Leadership and Organizing
Methodological crises and contextual solutions
Why Research Leadership in Higher Education? Exploring Contributions from the UK's Leadership Foundation for Higher Education
Leading questions
The Practice of Leadership in the Messy World of Organizations
Living Leadership
Notes from a small Island
Location, location, location
Problems, problems, problems
Relational leadership
Liquid modernity and power
From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice
Lords of the Dance
An Ethical Approach to Leading Change
Pluralism in qualitative research
Accomplishing 'the case' in paediatrics and child health
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |