Identity Work through Support and Control
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12901952 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kerstin Svensson (0000-0003-2503-0444, Parsons (United States), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 234-248 |
| Publication date | 2009-10-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethics and Social Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1749-6535 • E-ISSN: 1749-6543 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17496530903209410 |
| OpenAlex | W2024030659 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 15 |
This article aims to understand how social workers and volunteers, people who see themselves as wanting to ‘do good’, justify the controlling actions they carry out in their everyday practice. They work in organizations that control and regulate the lives of people, while at the same time striving to carry out supportive actions. How, then, do they see themselves, their role and their identity? This is explored through narratives from social workers and volunteers in three organizations in Sweden: victim support, a social services team working with people with drug problems and a probation service. From the narratives of social workers, volunteers and their clients, collected by the author for previous studies, different ways of coping with ‘caring power’, the combination of care and control, are revealed. Both social workers’ and volunteers’ self-identity is understood to be associated primarily with their wish to see themselves as good people, and far less with their actions in the name of their organization. When control is implicit, as in victim support, social workers and volunteers can ignore the controlling aspects of their role. When care and control are obviously combined, as in the social services, they split their understanding so that the individual social worker is regarded as being good, while the organization represents the controlling function. In the probation service, where control is central, social workers and volunteers rewrite their controlling function so that even here they act as good people
Control (management · Coping (psychology · Identity (music · Management · Narrative · Political science · Power (physics · Public relations · Social control · Social group · Social identity theory · Social science · Sociology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work
Newcomer parents with child welfare histories
Powerful and Vulnerable
Inclusionary control? Theorizing the effects of penal voluntary organizations’ work
Identity work of welfare service users in participatory spaces
HIV Health Care Providers as Street-Level Bureaucrats
Exploring the Context of Fitness to Practise Concerns About Social Workers in England
The Penal Voluntary Sector
What next for courtroom special measures? Embodying legal geographies through “appreciative‐assemblage” methodology
Human service organizations
Human services as complex organizations
The System of Professions
Discipline and Punish
Under the cover of kindness
Moral Character in Social Work
Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion
Critical Commentary
Virtue Ethics and Social Work
Tvånget i tvångsvården
Interaction Ritual Chains
Governing the Soul - a Quarter of a Century On
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,89 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |