Institutional and environmental effectiveness
Will the Paris Agreement work
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12929081 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Radoslav S Dimitrov (0000-0001-8810-5138, Western University), Jon Hovi (0000-0002-2330-7473, University of Oslo, autor de correspondencia), Detlef F Sprinz (0000-0002-2255-6988, University of Potsdam), Håkon Grøn Sælen (0000-0003-0327-4843, CICERO Center for International Climate Research), Arild Underdal (CICERO Center for International Climate Research) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 10 |
| Número | 4 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-02-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.583 |
| OpenAlex | W2915199839 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 23 |
| Referencias citadas | 52 |
The 2015 Paris Agreement (PA) has been widely hailed as a diplomatic triumph and a breakthrough in global climate cooperation. However, it is commonly accepted that the PA's collective goal—keeping global warming “well below” 2°C above preindustrial levels—remains ambitious. Making matters even more challenging, in 2017, global CO 2 emissions resumed growth after 3 years of near standstill. In 2018, this growth accelerated. It is therefore extremely important that the PA's institutional architecture meet expectations concerning its ability to induce member countries to promise and deliver emissions reductions. This study offers a review of the rapidly growing literature on the PA, to assess its strengths and weaknesses, its significance, and its prospects. We focus on evaluations of its institutional structure and its ability to induce member countries to implement policies. We frame the issues as a trilemma: the challenge of simultaneously satisfying all three main conditions for effectiveness—broad participation, deep commitments, and satisfactory compliance rates. Based on our review, we conclude that the key challenge for the PA will likely be to facilitate sufficiently fast ratcheting‐up of nationally determined contributions, while keeping compliance rates high. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance
Business · Climate change · Compliance (psychology · Corporate governance · Global governance · Political science · Strengths and weaknesses · Trilemma · Work (physics · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Psychology · Social Psychology · Finance
Governing Climate Change under the Paris Regime
The Paris Agreement’s inherent tension between ambition and compliance
Assessing the effectiveness of orchestrated climate action from five years of summits
Years of International Climate Negotiations
The false certainties of climate policy
The Paris agreement and key actors’ domestic climate policy mixes
Evaluation of the UNFCCC Technology Mechanism’s contribution to an international climate policy framework
Europe’s nature governance revolution
Under What Conditions Will the Paris Process Produce a Cycle of Increasing Ambition Sufficient to Reach the 2°C Goal
The Ambition Trap
Comparing the Sequence of Climate Change Mitigation Targets and Policies in Major Emitting Economies
Reconnecting Climate Governance With Sustainable Development
Tourism and the climate crisis
Is the Paris Agreement effective? A systematic map of the evidence
Driving decarbonization? Corporate responses to the Paris climate agreement in the global automotive sector
Exploring Global Climate Policy Futures and Their Representation in Integrated Assessment Models
Integrating institutional approaches and decision science to address climate change
Revisiting climate ambition
Clumsy solutions and climate change
The challenge of ratcheting up climate ambitions
Governing through the nationally determined contribution (NDC)
Participation, ambition and compliance
Phase-out clubs
Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis
Global Warming Gridlock
Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?
How to win public support for a global carbon tax
Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C
The Trilemma in History
Unilateral or Reciprocal Climate Policy? Experimental Evidence from China
The Paris Agreement
Paris
The Paris Agreement
Conference Diplomacy
How strong is public support for unilateral climate policy and what drives it
Order out of Chaos
The Paris Agreement on Climate Change
Contested Accountability Logics in Evolving Nonstate Certification for Fisheries Sustainability
All Hands on Deck”
Under What Conditions Will the Paris Process Produce a Cycle of Increasing Ambition Sufficient to Reach the 2°C Goal
This Changes Nothing
Distributive fairness
How robust is public support for unilateral climate policy
Equity in Climate Change
Transnational Climate Governance Initiatives
Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement
Is There a Broader-Deeper Trade-off in International Multilateral Agreements
Climate Change Politics
Climate change leaders and followers
The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics
| Obras citantes distintas | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,29 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 23 |