Accumulating phones
Aid and adaptation in phone access for the urban poor
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13012017 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Will Marler (0000-0003-0380-1279, Northwestern University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 155-174 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mobile Media & Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2050-1579 • E-ISSN: 2050-1587 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2050157918800350 |
| OpenAlex | W2899639619 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 37 |
This study draws on participant observation and interviews with low-income adults in Chicago to show how the poor stay connected to phone service and mobile Internet through the possession of multiple phones, including those subsidized by government aid. The “accumulation” of phones by individuals is widely observed, though underexplored in scholarship. Popular media coverage in the US frames the possession of multiple phones by people in poverty as criminal or excessive. In contrast, this study identifies three functions for phone accumulation as a strategy for maintaining phone access: to back up other phones, to build up capacities across phones, and to share phones with others in need. Each function responds to struggles unique for the urban poor as mobile technology advances and public phone access declines. Extra phones insure against regular disconnections due to loss and theft of devices and limits on subsidized service. Active service on one device combines with Internet functionality on another to approximate a single, high-end device and service plan. Subsidized phones help overcome the hesitation that poor people feel in lending out their devices to others in need. Accumulation thus contributes to the goal of securing reliable phone access for low-income Americans. There are limits to accumulation as a strategy for maintaining access, which result from the prevalence of inferior hardware, limited service plans, and lack of trust among strangers. Telecommunications policies should adapt to the needs of low-income phone users with accumulation in mind. The article concludes with recommendations for adapting policy to the needs of low-income phone users
Advertising · Business · Economics · Government (linguistics · Internet access · Internet privacy · Mobile phone · Phone · Possession (linguistics · Service (business · Subsidy · Telecommunications · The Internet · Computer Science · ICT Impact and Policies · ICT in Developing Communities · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Marketing
Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing
Waiting for power
‘You can’t talk at the library’
Beyond the individual level
What happens next? The ever-dreaded “knock” and mobile access instability for vehicle residents
Technologies of inclusion and marginalization
Help after Hardship
Digital disparities beyond the stably housed
The power divide
Doing Mobile Media and Communication scholarship in different keys
Disconnection divide
Changes in Digital Communication During the Covid-19 Global Pandemic
Someone Else Is Behind The Screen
Making Ends Meet
After Access
Information from Markets Near and Far
Healthcare via Cell Phones
Comparing internet and mobile phone usage
All our kin
The contemporary US digital divide
Off the Books
Income Risk, Coping Strategies, and Safety Nets
The Digital Provide
Smartphone Internet access and use
Health benefits and barriers to cell phone use in low-income urban U.S. neighborhoods
Mobile phone appropriation in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Evaluating Shared Access
Mobilising Poverty
Universal Service from the Bottom Up
The Emerging Mobile Internet Underclass
Reinvention in the Innovation Process
The Rules of Beeping
Accumulating Being
Mobile Communication and Society
Mobile Phones and Economic Development in Africa
Mitt Romney's Racist Appeals
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |