Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Angry about Fraud

How Congress Took up Trump’s Claims of Fraud

Bibliographic Data

ID13057794
AuthorsHeath Brown (0000-0002-8423-2700, City University of New York, corresponding author), Lindsey Cormack (0000-0001-8464-1806, Stevens Institute of Technology)
Year2021
Volume19
Issue1
Pages77-95
Publication date2021-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Forum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2194-6183 • E-ISSN: 1540-8884
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/for-2021-0004
OpenAlexW3192302993
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited34

Talk of fraud dominated President Donald J. Trump’s campaign and time in office. In this article, we explore whether members of Congress followed Trump’s lead in discussing all types of fraud, including electoral fraud as well as fraud, waste, and abuse. Using a unique dataset of the universe of congressional electronic newsletters from 2010 to 2021, we show that Republicans wrote to constituents about fraud much more than Democrats, especially about electoral fraud after Trump’s election, but it was Democrats who used angrier rhetoric to discuss fraud, a check on the President and many of the false claims about voter fraud in 2016 and 2020. These findings show an important aspect of the inter-party and inter-branch dynamics at play during Trump’s presidency; once keen to focus on fraud, waste and abuse in government congressional Republican attention shifted once the head of the executive branch was a co-partisan to parroting the claims of electoral and voter fraud made by the President

Government (linguistics · House of Representatives · Patriot Act · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Rhetoric · Terrorism · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration

  • Comparative Perspectives on Electoral Integrity Beliefs

    Open Access•Maike Rump•Politics and Governance•2026

  • Perception and Mobilization of “Truth”

    Open Access•Lindsay H Hoffman, William R Leslie et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Why Americans Hate Welfare

    Martin Gilens•Why Americans hate welfare•1999

  • How the Tea Party Captured the GOP

    R M Blum, Rachel M Blum et al.•How the Tea Party captured the GOP•2020

  • American Rage

    Open Access•Steven W Webster•American Rage•2020

  • Asymmetric Politics

    Matthew Grossmann, Matt Grossman et al.•Asymmetric politics•2016

  • Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Hard White

    Richard C Fording, F Schram et al.•Hard White•2020

  • The Myth of Voter Fraud

    Lorraine C Minnite•Myth of Voter Fraud•2019

  • Between Anger and Engagement

    Open Access•Christopher Towler, Christopher C Towler et al.•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2018

  • No Deal

    Open Access•George C Edwards•The Forum•2017

  • President Trump and Congressional Republicans

    Open Access•Kathryn Pearson•The Forum•2017

  • Presidential Home Style

    Open Access•Marion R Just, Joseph Saraceno et al.•The Forum•2020

  • Who are President Trump’s Allies in the House of Representatives

    Open Access•Andrew J Clarke, J A Jenkins•The Forum•2017

  • Political Advertising in 2014

    Open Access•Erika Franklin Fowler, Travis N Ridout•The Forum•2014

  • Legislator Adoption of the Fake News Label

    Open Access•Mike Cowburn, Michael Oswald•The Forum•2020

  • The Strategic Promotion of Distrust in Government in the Tea Party Age

    Open Access•Amy Fried, Douglas B Harris•The Forum•2015

  • Trump and the Republican Congress

    Open Access•Jason S Byers, Jamie L Carson•The Forum•2017

  • From emotion to action among Asian Americans

    Davin L Phoenix, Maneesh Arora•Politics Groups and Identities•2018

  • Response to John L. Campbell’s review of Reactionary Republicanism

    Open Access•Bryan T Gervais, Irwin L Morris•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Crafting accountability policy

    Open Access•Robin J Kempf•Policy and Society•2015

  • The De Facto Independence of Federal Offices of Inspector General

    Open Access•Robin J Kempf, Jessica Cabrera et al.•The American Review of Public…•2018

  • The Anger Gap

    Open Access•Davin L Phoenix•Anger Gap•2019

  • The Polarization of American Politics

    Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Somos Más

    Open Access•Angela Gutierrez, Angela X Ocampo et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism

    Open Access•Vanessa Williamson, T Skocpol et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2011

  • Divided We Quarrel

    Open Access•David C W Parker, Matthew Dull•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Measuring Congressional Partisanship and Its Consequences

    Open Access•Jeremy Gelman, Shanika L Wilson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Does Congress Still Care about Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

    Heath Brown•Public Integrity•2021

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae