Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Combining wind power and farmed fish

Coastal community perceptions of multi-use offshore renewable energy installations in Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID13067417
AuthorsSuzannah‐Lynn Billing (0000-0002-8467-9449, Scottish Association For Marine Science, corresponding author), George Charalambides (0000-0001-7297-2229, Scottish Association For Marine Science), Paul Tett (0000-0003-3574-1100, Scottish Association For Marine Science, corresponding author), Michelle Giordano, Carlo Ruzzo (0000-0002-2780-8240, University of Reggio Calabria), Felice Arena (0000-0002-0517-1859, University of Reggio Calabria), Anita Santoro (0000-0003-0499-9512, Wave Up (Italy)), Fabrizio Lagasco (0000-0002-0006-6486), Giulio Brizzi (0000-0001-9587-5069), Maurizio Collu (0000-0001-7692-4988, University of Strathclyde)
Year2021
Volume85
Pages102421-102421
Publication date2021-12-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnergy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.erss.2021.102421
OpenAlexW4200245687
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited50

There is increasing competition for space in coastal seas as new industrial sectors, such as Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) and Aquaculture, seek to expand. Multi-Use - involving sharing of space and, in some cases, facilities - can lessen competition and reduce industry costs if societal and economic challenges can be overcome. An example societal challenge is that of gaining Social Licence to Operate (SLO) for 'Multifunctional Offshore Installations' (MOI) combining fish farming with MRE (from wind and waves) in a large floating structure. This article reports a mixed-methods study at two potential MOI deployment sites in 2019, aiming to understand the local context for SLO. A survey was carried out in Reggio Calabria, Italy, with 108 respondents, and in Islay, Scotland, with 127 respondents. Questions concerned opinions about MRE and fish-farming, separately and combined. A facilitated workshop in Reggio Calabria provided additional qualitative data. Most findings were the same in both places. Respondents thought better of MRE than fish-farming but remained moderately likely to eat fish produced in MOI. The majority distrusted regulators to control environmental impacts of the technology. The main differences were that respondents in Reggio Calabria anticipated local benefits from MOI industrial activity, and were more likely to accept development by non-local owners than were people on Islay. We interpreted the findings in a conceptual framework that combines theory for SLO with theory for Action Situations, hypothesising that a community’s diffuse and perhaps heterogenous opinions might ‘crystalise’ around an issue during an Action Situation. The hypothesis will be tested when a prototype MOI is deployed near Reggio Calabria in 2021

Agriculture · Business · Competition (biology · Conceptual framework · Context (archaeology · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Fishery · Geography · Local community · Offshore wind power · Renewable energy · Sociology · Software deployment · Wind power · Coastal and Marine Management · Engineering · Environmental Science · Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Ecology

  • Unlocking multi-use synergies

    Open Access•Carlos V C Weiss, Bárbara Ondiviela et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Operationalizing marine multifunctionality in Europe

    Open Access•Karina Barquet, Luciana Fernandes Coelho•Marine Policy•2026

  • The hidden costs of multi-use at sea

    Open Access•E Ciravegna, Luc van Hoof et al.•Marine Policy•2024

  • Leaving the niche

    Open Access•Paul Tett, George Charalambides et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Revisiting the social licence to operate in the energy transition

    Open Access•Conchúr Ó Maonaigh, Louise M Fitzgerald et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Assessing the Impact of Marine Tourism and Protection on Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Integrated Approach

    Open Access•Urai Ridho A M F Banarsyadhimi, Paul Dargusch et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry

    Open Access•Jason Prno•Resources Policy•2013

  • The paths to social licence to operate

    Open Access•Kieren Moffat, Airong Zhang•Resources Policy•2014

  • Understanding ‘local’ opposition to wind development in the UK

    Open Access•Christopher R Jones, J Richard Eiser•Energy Policy•2010

  • Understanding public responses to offshore wind power

    Open Access•Claire Haggett•Energy Policy•2011

  • Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity

    Open Access•B K Sovacool, Pushkala Lakshmi Ratan•Renewable and Sustainable Energy…•2012

  • The social licence to operate

    Kieren Moffat, Jacqueline Lacey et al.•Forestry•2016

  • The Meaning of Social Capital and its Link to Collective Action

    Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром et al.•Handbook of Social Capital•2009

  • The Symbolic Construction of Community

    Anthony P Cohen•Symbolic Construction of Community•1985

  • Understanding Institutional Diversity

    Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL…•2006

  • Public opinion and environmental policy output

    Open Access•Brilé Anderson, Tobias Böhmelt et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda

    Open Access•B K Sovacool•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

  • What’s love got to do with it? Understanding local cognitive and affective responses to wind power projects

    Open Access•Aaron Russell, Jeremy Firestone•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Ordering theories

    Open Access•B K Sovacool, David J He•Social Studies of Science•2017

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Making Democracy Work

    Robert D Putnam, Robert Leonardi et al.•Making Democracy Work•1994

  • An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop

    Open Access•Michael D Mcginnis•Policy Studies Journal•2011

  • Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions

    Open Access•Aaron Wildavsky•American Political Science Review•1987

  • A Systems Approach Framework for the Transition to Sustainable Development

    Open Access•Tom Sawyer Hopkins, Denis Bailly et al.•Conservation Ecology•2012

  • The emergence of social licence necessitates reforms in environmental regulation

    Open Access•Elizabeth I Van Putten, Ingrid E Van Putten et al.•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • A Systems Approach Framework for Coastal Zones

    Open Access•Tom Sawyer Hopkins, Denis Bailly et al.•Conservation Ecology•2011

  • Integrating quantitative and qualitative research

    Open Access•Alan Bryman•Qualitative Research•2006

  • Bonding and Bridging Social Capital

    Open Access•M Leonard•Sociology•2004

  • Gemeinschaft Revisited

    Open Access•Brint, Steven Brint•Sociological Theory•2001

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae