The Doomsday Argument Reconsidered
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13123778 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jon Mills (0000-0003-3673-0884, Adelphi University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 113-127 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Eidos A Journal for Philosophy of Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2544-302X • E-ISSN: 2544-302X |
| Publisher | University of Warsaw (PUBLISHER • PL) |
| DOI | 10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0035 |
| OpenAlex | W3117961974 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
In our current unstable world, nuclear warfare, climate crises, and techno nihilism are three perilous clouds hovering over an anxious humanity. In this article I examine our current state of affairs with regard to the imminent risk of nuclear holocaust, rapid climate emergencies destroying the planet, and the cultural and political consequences of emerging technologies on the fate of civilization. In the wake of innumerable existential threats to the future of our world, I revisit the plausibility of the Doomsday Argument, which predicts the end of human existence
Argument (complex analysis · Civilization · Environmental ethics · Existentialism · Humanity · Nihilism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · History · Law · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |