Group Rights in Post-Apartheid South Africa
The Case of the Traditional Leaders
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14799720 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barbara Oomen (0000-0003-4033-8746, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 44 |
| Pages | 73-103 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0732-9113 • E-ISSN: 2305-9931 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07329113.1999.10756538 |
| OpenAlex | W2123910267 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 25 |
South African’s first democratic constitution provides that the “institution, status and role of traditional leadership, according to customary law, are recognized“. The recognition of indigenous rulers and their administrative and judicial powers may be interpreted as a continuation of former native rule policies as well as a distinctive feature of a modern state. On the one hand, the recognition is linked to the country’s colonial and apartheid past, during which ethnic identity was forcibly created and compartmentalized in ’homelands’ with imported tribesmen and customary law. On the other hand, the claims of the chiefs form an example of the larger-scale contemporary political demand for the legal recognition of cultural diversity, in the form of minority and group rights. Thus considered, state recognition of chiefs and their subjects poses the same problems of inclusion and exclusion as are faced when any group in society is carved out and granted a separate legal status. An additional problem is that recognition of customary law and traditional leadership by the state is generally based on questionable anthropological assumptions about the social fabric of the rural local community. Traditional leadership is presented as an age-old African form of governance, a community-based and consensus-oriented alternative to the western administration. Now that these notions, and even the possibility of considering the locality as a separate, static unit of analysis, are increasingly problematized within the field of anthropology, the possibility of fixing this fuzzy reality in a legal framework is affected
Constitution · Democracy · Identity (music · Indigenous · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Land Rights and Reforms · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · South African History and Culture
Towards understanding the contextual role of traditional leadership in the establishment of cyber communities amongst rural people in South Africa
Occult Beliefs, Globalisation and the Quest for Development in African Societies
A Biography of Bones
Traditional Authority Revisited
The impact of political transformation on employment in the Transkei bureaucracy and civil service in Umtata, South Africa since 1994
The trade-offs of win–win conservation rhetoric
"We must now go back to our history" Retraditionalisation in a Northern Province Chieftaincy
The African National Congress and Traditional Leadership in a Democratic South Africa
Distinction without Difference
Diversity behind constructed unity
Legitimacy in Areas of Limited Statehood
Post-Apartheid 'Tribalism'? Land, Ethnicity and Discourses on San Subversion in West Caprivi, Namibia1
Law, custom, and social order
Modernity at large
The Nation and Its Fragments
Ethnicity and constitutionalism in contemporary Ethiopia
Traditional Leaders in South Africa’s New Democracy
What is Legal Pluralism
The African Renaissance
State, Law and Community in the World System
The Rights of Minority Cultures
Bureaucracy and Race
South African Yearbook of International Affairs
South Africa
Clan and Superclan
States and Chiefs
The Rights of Minority Cultures
Die inhoud, betekenis en enkele implikasies van die Handves van Regte in die 1996‐grondwet
One Chief, One Vote
Legally Mediated Identity
Bureaucracy and Race
South Africa and the African Renaissance
Bureaucracy and Race
Of Revelation and Revolution, Volume 2
Citizen and Subject
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,46 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2025 (26) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |