Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why blend conversation analysis with cognitive grammar

Bibliographic Data

ID14962284
AuthorsMarja Etelämäki (0000-0002-9279-5810, corresponding author), Laura Visapää (0000-0002-1039-4416)
Year2015
Pages477-506
Publication date2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1018-2101 • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/prag.24.3.03ete
OpenAlexW2335236225
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited58

This article proposes that combining Conversation Analysis (CA) with Cognitive Grammar (CG) provides a fruitful framework for studying language as a socio-cognitive phenomenon. The authors first discuss two indexical phenomena, the Finnish demonstratives and the Finnish free-standing infinitives; these are first analyzed using the methods of CA, then rediscussed in the framework of CG. The description of both phenomena relies on the CG notion of grounding elements, i.e., the elements that conceptualize some facet of the ground (speech situation) as part of their meaning. The authors argue that such meaning associated with grammar includes knowledge about the schematic organization of the ground, and that the grammatical means for conceptualizing the ground make dynamic co-construction of the speech situation possible. Whereas the authors rely on the terminology of CG when describing the con-strual of the ground, they strongly underline the fact that the ways in which the ground is construed can only be found out using the methods of CA. In this way, combining CA with CG can offer us an approach where language is analyzed as the interface of the human mind and the social world

Cognition · Cognitive grammar · Common ground · Construction Grammar · Conversation · Epistemology · Grammar · Indexicality · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Phenomenon · Terminology · Communication · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Quand venir+infinitif vient dynamiser le discours

    Open Access•Charlotte Danino•Linx•2025

  • Negotiating embodied space in anxiety narratives

    Open Access•Olivia Knapton•Metaphor and the Social World•2020

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Marja Etelämäki•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2016

  • Dependence of construal on linguistic and pre-linguistic intersubjectivity

    Open Access•Tapani Möttönen•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2016

  • Dimensions of empathy in relation to language

    Open Access•Ilona Herlin, Laura Visapää•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2016

  • Infinitives of affect and intersubjectivity

    Open Access•Laura Visapää•Cognitive Linguistics•2022

  • Levinson, Stephen C.

    Open Access•Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar Garcés‐conejos Blitvich•Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics•2026

  • Grammar and Conceptualization

    Ronald W Langacker•Grammar and Conceptualization•1999

  • Approaching Dialogue

    Per Linell, Per Linnell•Approaching Dialogue (IMPACT:…•1998

  • Cognitive Grammar

    Ronald W Langacker, Ronald Langacker•Cognitive Grammar•2008

  • Interaction and Grammar

    Open Access•Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Interaction and Grammar•1996

  • Responding in Conversation

    Marja-Leena Sorjonen•Responding in conversation•2001

  • Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure

    Pa Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure Pittsburgh, Joan Bybee…•Frequency and the Emergence of…•2001

  • Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments

    Cecilia E Ford, Barbara A Fox et al.•The language of turn and sequence•2002

  • Territories of knowledge, territories of experience

    Open Access•J Heritage•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Turn organization

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Interaction and Grammar•1996

  • Brain-to-brain coupling

    Open Access•Uri Hasson, Asif A Ghazanfar et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2012

  • Referential practice

    William F Hanks•Referential practice•1990

  • Meaning in Anthropology

    Henry A Selby, Keith Basso et al.•Meaning in Anthropology•1977

  • Information Structure and Sentence Form

    Open Access•Knud Lambrecht•Information Structure and…•1994

  • Sequence Organization in Interaction

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Sequence Organization in…•2007

  • The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation

    Open Access•Tanya Stivers, L Mondada et al.•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Grounding

    Frank Brisard•Grounding•2002

  • Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction

    Harrie Mazeland, Mike Huiskes•Studies in Interactional…•2001

  • On some uses of the discourse particle ‘kyl(lä)’ in Finnish conversation

    Auli Hakulinen•Studies in Interactional…•2001

  • Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology

    Paul S Adler, Paul Adler et al.•Oxford Handbook of Sociology,…•2014

  • Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion

    Susanne Günthner•Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der…•2000

  • The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”

    Open Access•Charles J Fillmore•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•1988

  • Affectivity in conversational storytelling

    Open Access•Margret Selting•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • What does grammar tell us about action

    Open Access•Elizabeth Couper‐kuhlen•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2015

  • Subjectification

    Open Access•Ronald W Langacker•Cognitive Linguistics•1990

  • Discourse in Cognitive Grammar

    Open Access•Ronald W Langacker•Cognitive Linguistics•2001

  • Some Other “Uh(m)”s 1

    Emanuel A Schegloff•Discourse Processes•2010

  • Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites

    Open Access•Richard Hudson•Lingua•1990

  • Concurrent operations on talk

    Open Access•Charles Goodwin, Marjorie Harness Goodwin•IPrA Papers in Pragmatics•2015

  • Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar

    Open Access•Holger Diessel•Cognitive Linguistics•2006

  • Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar

    Peter Auer•Third Text•2005

  • Opening up Closings

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff, Harvey Sacks•Semiotica•1973

  • Finnish kato

    Open Access•Auli Hakulinen, Eeva-Leena Seppänen•Journal of Pragmatics•1992

  • The Finnish demonstrative pronouns in light of interaction

    Open Access•Marja Etelämäki•Journal of Pragmatics•2009

  • Discourse patterns for turn-final conjunctions

    Open Access•Aino Koivisto•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • Demonstratives in Space and Interaction

    Open Access•N J Enfield•Language•2003

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • Rethinking Context

    Open Access•Zdenek Salzmann, A Duranti et al.•Language•1993

  • On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation

    Gail Jefferson•Social Problems•1988

  • Explorations in the Deictic Field

    William F Hanks•Current Anthropology•2005

  • Repair After Next Turn

    Emanuel A Schegloff•American Journal of Sociology•1992

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,6
Citation span2016 - 2025 (10)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae