Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is equity meaningfully incorporated into pandemic preparedness and response? A scoping review and critical analysis of Ebola and Covid-19 outbreak responses in Uganda 2019-2023

Pandemic preparedness, response and equity: A scoping review from Uganda

Bibliographic Data

ID15295572
AuthorsGema Redondo (Massey University, corresponding author), Linda Murray (0000-0001-7066-656X, Massey University), Collette Bromhead (0000-0002-2890-2191, Massey University), Issa Makumbi (0000-0003-3579-2485, National Institute of Public Health and Public Health Emergency Operations Centre)
Year2025
Volume35
Issue1
Publication date2025-10-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0958-1596 • E-ISSN: 1469-3682
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09581596.2025.2574954
OpenAlexW4415543970
LanguageEN
References cited32

Societal inequities produce vulnerabilities that infectious disease can exploit. Current approaches to pandemic prevention, detection and response are led by the International Health Regulations IHR and the Global Health Security Agenda. However, to contain the spread of infectious diseases, localised action to address systemic inequities must be considered. The purpose of this scoping review and equity analysis is to 1) Synthesise the available information on Uganda’s Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) and COVID-19 preparedness and outbreak responses between 2019 and 2023, and 2) Critique if and how Uganda’s Ministry of Health incorporated concepts of health equity in its EVD and COVID-19 interventions, while building national capacity to identify and prevent public health emergencies. This scoping review and critical analysis was conducted following the five-stage process defined by Levac et al. After identification and screening, the scoping review was based on six preparedness and response plans, three after-action reviews, and 20 grey literature and peer-reviewed articles. The findings revealed that the EVD and COVID-19 preparedness and response plans in Uganda show the country’s commitment and readiness for early detection and response to infectious disease outbreaks. However, further examination of the plans reveals missed opportunities to address systemic inequities. The ongoing mpox outbreak, declared a PHEIC by WHO on July 23, 2022, with significant impacts in African countries including Uganda, further underscores the need for a paradigm shift in managing infectious disease outbreaks. Such a shift may be similar to that experienced by the field of disaster risk reduction, which underwent a significant transformation at the Sendai Conference in 2015 towards a more holistic and proactive approach that addresses underlying systemic issues and focuses on building resilience. The exclusive focus on biomedical strategies to manage infectious diseases fails to address the social aspects of transmission, the local perceptions of illness, and community vulnerabilities often associated with social and historical perspectives. The social determinants of health disparities should be incorporated into pandemic planning and response. This will contribute to fostering equitable health outcomes and resilience in the face of the multifaceted challenges posed by future pandemics and environmental changes

Equity (law · Global health · Health care · Health equity · International Health Regulations · Outbreak · Pandemic · Preparedness · Public health · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Zoonotic diseases and public health

  • Achieving health equity

    Open Access•Michael Marmot•The Lancet•2007

  • Health systems resilience in managing the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Viscount Haldane, Chuan De Foo et al.•Nature Medicine•2021

  • Pathways to zoonotic spillover

    Open Access•Raina K Plowright, Colin R Parrish et al.•Nature Reviews Microbiology•2017

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Scoping studies

    Open Access•Danielle Levac, Heather Colquhoun et al.•Implementation Science•2010

  • Social determinants of health inequalities

    Open Access•Michael Marmot•The Lancet•2005

  • Forty-two years of responding to Ebola virus outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Sima Rugarabamu, Leonard E G Mboera et al.•BMJ Global Health•2020

  • How can we strengthen the Joint External Evaluation

    Open Access•Daniel Stowell, Richard Garfield•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • The role of international support programmes in global health security capacity building

    Open Access•Anne Doble, Zoe Sheridan et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  • Analysis of the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Yibeltal Assefa, Charles F Gilks et al.•Globalization and Health•2022

  • Getting the most from after action reviews to improve global health security

    Open Access•Michael A Stoto, Christopher Nelson et al.•Globalization and Health•2019

  • History Repeating—How Pandemics Collide with Health Disparities in the United States

    Open Access•Grace Mccarthy, Sarah Shore et al.•Journal of Racial and Ethnic…•2023

  • Power, fairness and trust

    Open Access•L Enria, Shelley Susan Lee et al.•BMC Public Health•2016

  • Community engagement and vulnerability in infectious diseases

    Open Access•Jacob Osborne, John Paget et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Health Equity and Development

    Open Access•Michael Marmot, Ruth Bell•European Review•2009

  • Not the great equalizers

    Open Access•Svenn‐erik Mamelund, Svenn-Erik Mamelund et al.•Population Studies•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae