Forecasting Changes in Religiosity and Existential Security with an Agent-Based Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15347932 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ross Gore (0000-0003-4065-6146, Dominion University College, corresponding author), Carlos Miguel Lemos (0000-0002-1419-4657, University of Agder), Carlos Lemos, F Leron Shults (0000-0002-0588-6977, University of Agder), Wesley J Wildman (0000-0002-7571-1259) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1460-7425 • E-ISSN: 1460-7425 |
| Publisher | Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.18564/jasss.3596 |
| OpenAlex | W2786879528 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
| References cited | 27 |
We employ existing data sets and agent-based modeling to forecast changes in religiosity and existential security among a collective of individuals over time. Existential security reflects the extent of economic, socioeconomic and human development provided by society. Our model includes agents in social networks interacting with one another based on the education level of the agents, the religious practices of the agents, and each agent's existential security within their natural and social environments. The data used to inform the values and relationships among these variables is based on rigorous statistical analysis of the International Social Survey Programme Religion Module (ISSP) and the Human Development Report (HDR). We conduct an evaluation that demonstrates, for the countries and time periods studied, that our model provides a more accurate forecast of changes in existential security and religiosity than two alternative approaches. The improved accuracy is largely due to the inclusion of social networks with educational homophily which alters the way in which religiosity and existential security change in the model. These dynamics grow societies where two individuals with the same initial religious practices (or belief In God, or supernatural beliefs) evolve di erently based on the educational backgrounds of the individuals with which they surround themselves. Finally, we discuss the limitations of our model and provide direction for future work
Existentialism · Homophily · Political science · Population · Religiosity · Social security · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social Psychology
New Advances in Cognitive Science of Religion
Simulating Machines
Religion Devolving
Computational Science of Religion
Det norske bibelbeltet
Why do the godless prosper? Modeling the cognitive and coalitional mechanisms that promote atheism
Minding morality
Dataset of Integrated Measures of Religion (DIM-R). Harmonization of religiosity data from selected international multiwave surveys
A.I. in Religion, A.I. for Religion, A.I. and Religion
Modeling the Effects of Religious Belief and Affiliation on Prosociality
Post-Supernatural Cultures
Simulating Secularities
Religious Exiting and Social Networks
Cognition, Culture, and Social Simulation
Evolutionary ethics and adaptive atheism
A Generative Model of the Mutual Escalation of Anxiety Between Religious Groups
Studying Close Entity Encounters of the Psychedelic Kind
Progress in simulating human geography
So, what's the coolest thing you learned from the models
Simulating theory and society
Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network
Mentalizing Deficits Constrain Belief in a Personal God
Social Learning and Deviant Behavior
The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion
Dynamic Social Impact
In Gods We Trust
Modelling terror management theory
The deification of historical figures and the emergence of priesthoods as a solution to a network coordination problem
Modelling Research Policy
Using Computational Modeling for Building Theory
The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution
(Un)believing in modern society
Education, Irreligion, and Non-religion
Rethinking Value Violation
Rejecting Evolution
From private attitude to public opinion
Computational Approaches to Studying the Co‐evolution of Networks and Behavior in Social Dilemmas
Demand for God and Government
Depolarization of attitudes in groups
The role for simulations in theory construction for the social sciences
Sacred and Secular
Social Learning and Deviant Behavior
Culture and Competition
Religiousness and Social Support
Income, Health, and Well-Being around the World
How to Survive the Anthropocene
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |