Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Boundary Work, Hybrid Practices, and Portable Representations

An Analysis of Global and National Coproductions of Red Lists

Bibliographic Data

ID15445327
AuthorsKarin M Gustafsson (0000-0002-1495-8346, corresponding author), R Lidskog (0000-0001-6735-0011)
Year2013
Volume8
Issue1
Pages30-52
Publication date2013-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNature and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1558-6073 • E-ISSN: 1558-5468
PublisherBerghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3167/nc.2013.080103
OpenAlexW2006943189
LanguageEN
Citations received7

For many countries, the IUCN Red List of threatened species is a central instrument in their work to counteract loss of biodiversity. This article analyzes the development of the Red List categories and criteria, how these categories and criteria are used in the construction of global, national, and regional red lists, and how the red lists are employed in policy work. A central finding of the article is that this mix of actors implies many different forms of boundary work. This article also finds that the Red List functions as a portable representation, that is, a context-independent instrument to represent nature. A third finding is that the Red List functions as a link between experts and policy makers. Thus, the Red List is best understood as a boundary object and hybrid practice where the credibility of scientific assessment and a specific policy is mutually strengthened

Archaeology · Biology · Boundary (topology · Boundary object · Boundary-work · Context (archaeology · Credibility · IUCN Red List · Object (grammar · Operations research · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Representation (politics · Social science · Sociology · Threatened species · Work (physics · Computer Science · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Engineering · Forest Management and Policy · History · Law · Mathematics · Public Administration · Species Distribution and Climate Change · Artificial Intelligence · Ecology

  • Boundary organizations and environmental governance

    Open Access•Karin M Gustafsson, R Lidskog•Climate Risk Management•2018

  • The role of the Red Lists of Ecosystems in leveraging sustainability changes in Finland – perceptions of the assessors

    Open Access•Anna Salomaa, Anni Arponen•Ecosystems and People•2023

  • “Useful to Us in Unknown Ways”

    Open Access•Kay E Lewis‐Jones, Kay E Lewis-Jones•Journal of Ethnobiology•2016

  • Segmented forest realities

    Open Access•Håkon Aspøy, Håkon B Stokland et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • How Many Wolves Does it Take to Protect the Population? Minimum Viable Population Size as a Technology of Government in Endangered Species Management (Norway, 1970s-2000s)

    Håkon B Stokland•Environment and History•2016

  • Courts of being and non-being

    Open Access•J Christopher Upton•Journal of Legal Anthropology•2022

  • Representing and regulating nature

    R Lidskog•Environmental Politics•2014

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,58
Citation span2014 - 2023 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae