A Study on the Evaluation of the Public Health Governance in Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15475452 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chenggang Zhang (0000-0002-6324-3670, Tsinghua University, corresponding author), Mingyu Wang (0009-0001-7568-289X, Tsinghua University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 22 |
| Pages | 14993-14993 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph192214993 |
| PMID | 36429710 |
| OpenAlex | W4309213957 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Social resilience for public health is a new theoretical framework for understanding public health risk governance capacity. This study identifies 18 indicators from the publicly available database and adopts the method of multivariable analysis to evaluate the level of social resilience for public health in 73 countries along the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The study finds that the main influencing factors of social resilience for public health are institutional resilience, physical resilience, and participation resilience. The capacity of public health risk governance in countries along the BRI is classified into three levels: high, medium, and low. A high level of public health risk governance capacity is mainly shown in developed European countries such as Italy, rich Southwestern Asian countries such as the United Arab Emirates, and East Asian countries represented by Japan, South Korea, and Singapore. The middle-level countries are mainly distributed at the junction of Eurasia, which Russia represents. The low-level countries are primarily distributed in South Asia, Africa, and the war zones. In general, countries along the BRI have polarized the capacity of public health risk governance and structural inequalities, mainly manifested in large differences in the organizational capacity and mobilization capacity between countries in response to public health risk events, and the gap between the rich and the poor within a country. Under such circumstances, the building of a Community of Common Health is required to be accelerated
Business · Corporate governance · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Geography · Political science · Psychological resilience · Public health · Resilience (materials science · Disaster Response and Management · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Medicine · Public Health Policies and Education
Cultures of Disaster
The diversity of resilience
What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola
Why inequality could spread Covid-19
Six attributes of social resilience
Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies
Explaining trends in inequities
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
At Risk
Health Vulnerability Index for Disaster Risk Reduction
Public health emergency preparedness
Resilience to natural hazards
Structural Foundations of Social Resilience
The reconstruction of resilience as a social and collective phenomenon
The paradox of social resilience
From practice to theory
Towards an understanding of resilience
Community Resilience and Public Health Practice
China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the Covid-19 crisis
Risk society and Covid-19
Global environmental change I
Social and ecological resilience
Risk as Moral Danger
Vulnerability
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems
The concept of resilience revisited
Health, Risk, and Resilience
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |