An Exploratory Assessment of Applying Risk Management Practices to Engineered Nanomaterials
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15499542 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ivo Iavicoli (0000-0003-0444-3792, University of Naples Federico II, corresponding author), Veruscka Leso (0000-0002-3039-2856, University of Naples Federico II), Marco Piacci (University of Naples Federico II), Dante Luigi Cioffi (University of Naples Federico II), Irina Guseva Canu (0000-0001-7059-8421, Institute for Work and Health), Paul A Schulte (0000-0002-0696-0446, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 18 |
| Pages | 3290-3290 |
| Publication date | 2019-09-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph16183290 |
| PMID | 31500229 |
| OpenAlex | W2971905538 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 15 |
The widespread industrial application of nanotechnology has increased the number of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), but it is not clear to what extent prevention guidance is practiced. Our aim was to explore the extent that companies manufacturing and/or using ENMs apply risk assessment and management measures. Thirty-four companies were surveyed with an international 35-item questionnaire investigating company and workforce features, types of ENM handled, and risk evaluation and preventive measures adopted. Among participating companies, 62% had a maximum of 10 employees. Metal-based nanomaterials were most frequently identified (73%). Environmental monitoring was performed by 41% of the companies, while engineering exposure controls were approximately reported by 50%. Information and training programs were indicated by 85% of the sample, only 9% performed specific health surveillance for ENM workers. Personal protective equipment primarily included gloves (100%) and eye/face protection (94%). This small-scale assessment can contribute to the limited amount of published literature on the topic. Future investigations should include a greater number of companies to better represent ENM workplaces and a direct access to industrial settings to collect information on site. Finally, deeper attention should be paid to define standardized frameworks for ENM risk assessment that may guide nano-specific preventive actions
Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Environmental health · Exploratory research · Occupational safety and health · Pathology · Personal protective equipment · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk assessment · Risk management · Sample (material · Scale (ratio · Workforce · Chemical Safety and Risk Management · Computer Science · Medicine · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Occupational Health and Safety Research
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2022 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |